Prospect theory and public service outcomes: Examining risk preferences in relation to public sector reforms

被引:26
作者
Baekgaard, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aarhus, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle,Bldg 1331, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; LOSS AVERSION; LOSSES; CHOICE; GAINS; DISTANCE; LARGER;
D O I
10.1111/padm.12324
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Prospect theory has been widely acknowledged in the social sciences as a frame for understanding how people deal with uncertainty. Yet, little is known about whether key expectations from prospect theory also hold in a public service setting. In this article, I draw on prospect theory to examine under what conditions citizens prefer uncertain - but potentially advantageous - reforms to reforms with more certain outcomes. A population-based survey experiment with the participation of 1,395 Danish citizens and two consecutive experiments with 1,680 US MTurkers produced a consistent pattern across contexts: citizens to a large extent prefer certain to risky reforms and are more willing to take risks if reforms are associated with gains rather than losses. The latter finding is in opposition to expectations and suggests that the particularities of the public sector should be taken into account when applying insights from prospect theory to this sector.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 942
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[22]   WAITING TIME AND DECISION-MAKING - IS TIME-LIKE MONEY [J].
LECLERC, F ;
SCHMITT, BH ;
DUBE, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1995, 22 (01) :110-119
[23]   Fear, anger, and risk [J].
Lerner, JS ;
Keltner, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :146-159
[24]   The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory [J].
Liberman, N ;
Trope, Y .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (01) :5-18
[25]   Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory Under MPs [J].
Linde, Jona ;
Vis, Barbara .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 38 (01) :101-117
[26]   Prospect theory in political science: Gains and losses from the first decade [J].
McDermott, R .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 25 (02) :289-312
[27]  
Ministry of Social Affairs and the Interior, 2016, SOC OG IND KOMM NOGL
[28]   Cognitive Biases in Governing: Technology Preferences in Election Administration [J].
Moynihan, Donald P. ;
Lavertu, Stephane .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (01) :68-77
[29]  
Mullinix K. J., 2015, J. Exp. Polit. Sci, V2, P109, DOI DOI 10.1017/XPS.2015.19
[30]  
Munck GeraldoL., 2005, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, V3, P385, DOI DOI 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00045-1