Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:52
作者
Patel, Nandinee [1 ]
Chong, Kok Wee [2 ]
Yip, Alexander Y. G. [3 ]
Ierodiakonou, Despo [4 ]
Bartra, Joan [5 ]
Boyle, Robert J. [1 ]
Turner, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, Norfolk Pl, London W2 1PG, England
[2] KK Womens & Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Med, Allergy Serv, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Imperial Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
[4] Univ Nicosia, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Med Sch, Nicosia, Cyprus
[5] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Epinephrine; allergic reaction; anaphylaxis; autoinjector device; refractory anaphylaxis; ORAL FOOD CHALLENGES; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; BIPHASIC REACTIONS; PEDIATRIC ANAPHYLAXIS; ALLERGIC REACTIONS; RISK-FACTORS; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; NUT ALLERGY; CHILDREN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Regulatory bodies recommend that all patients at risk of anaphylaxis be prescribed 2 epinephrine autoinjectors, which they should carry at all times. This is in contrast to some guidelines. The proportion of anaphylaxis reactions that are treated with multiple doses of epinephrine has not been systematically evaluated. Objective: Our aim was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting epinephrine treatment for anaphylaxis in which data relating to the number of doses administered were available. Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies reporting at least 10 anaphylaxis events (due to food or venom) from 1946 until January 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias was assessed. The study was registered under the PROSPERO identifier CRD42017069109. Results: A total of 86 studies (36,557 anaphylaxis events) met the inclusion criteria (20 of the studies [23%] were prospective studies; 64 [74%] reported reactions in the community, and 22 [26%] included food challenge data). Risk of bias was assessed as low in 50 studies. Overall, 7.7% of anaphylaxis events from any cause (95% CI = 6.4-9.1) were treated with multiple doses of epinephrine. When only epinephrine-treated reactions for which subsequent doses were administered by a health care professional were considered, 11.1% of food-induced reactions (95% CI = 9.4-13.2) and 17.1% of venom-induced reactions (95% CI = 11.3-25.0) were treated with more than 1 epinephrine dose. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the meta-analyses, but at sensitivity analysis this estimate was not affected by study design or anaphylaxis definition. Conclusion: Around 1 in 10 anaphylaxis reactions are treated with more than 1 dose of epinephrine.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1315
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
[21]  
Chatelier J, 2019, INTERN MED J, V49, P18
[22]   Pre-hospital management of anaphylaxis in one Canadian Urban Centre [J].
Chung, Timothy ;
Gaudet, Lindsay ;
Vandenberghe, Christine ;
Couperthwaite, Stephanie ;
Sookram, Sunil ;
Liss, Kim ;
Villa-Roel, Cristina ;
Rowe, Brian H. .
RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (08) :1077-1082
[23]   Good prognosis, clinical features, and circumstances of peanut and tree nut reactions in children treated by a specialist allergy center [J].
Clark, Andrew T. ;
Ewan, Pamela W. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 122 (02) :286-289
[24]   Improved diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis in a pediatric emergency department (2013-2018) [J].
Cohen, Neta ;
Capua, Tali ;
Pivko-Levy, Dikla ;
Ben-Shoshan, Moshe ;
Rimon, Ayelet ;
Benor, Shira .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2019, 7 (08) :2882-+
[25]   Anaphylaxis in an Emergency Department: a Retrospective 10-year Study in a Tertiary Hospital [J].
Coutinho, I. A. ;
Ferreira, D. ;
Regateiro, F. S. ;
Pita, J. ;
Ferreira, M. ;
Martins, J. F. ;
Fonseca, I. A. ;
Loureiro, C. ;
Todo-Bom, A. .
EUROPEAN ANNALS OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 52 (01) :23-34
[26]   Anaphylaxis in referred pediatric patients: demographic and clinical features, triggers, and therapeutic approach [J].
De Swert, Liliane F. A. ;
Bullens, Dominique ;
Raes, Marc ;
Dermaux, Anna-Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2008, 167 (11) :1251-1261
[27]  
Dibs S D, 1997, Pediatrics, V99, pE7, DOI 10.1542/peds.99.1.e7
[28]  
Dogru M, 2017, GUNCEL PEDIATRI, V15, P12, DOI 10.4274/jcp.58070
[29]   Identification of children with anaphylaxis at low risk of receiving acute inpatient therapies [J].
Dribin, Timothy E. ;
Michelson, Kenneth A. ;
Monuteaux, Michael C. ;
Stack, Anne M. ;
Farbman, Karen S. ;
Schneider, Lynda C. ;
Neuman, Mark I. .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02)
[30]   NUT Co Reactivity - ACquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT CRACKER) study [J].
Elizur, A. ;
Appel, M. Y. ;
Nachshon, L. ;
Levy, M. B. ;
Epstein-Rigbi, N. ;
Golobov, K. ;
Goldberg, M. R. .
ALLERGY, 2018, 73 (03) :593-601