PET performance evaluation of MADPET4: a small animal PET insert for a 7 T MRI scanner

被引:46
|
作者
Omidvari, Negar [1 ]
Cabello, Jorge [1 ]
Topping, Geoffrey [1 ]
Schneider, Florian R. [1 ,4 ]
Paul, Stephan [2 ]
Schwaiger, Markus [1 ]
Ziegler, Sibylle I. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Nucl Med, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Phys Dept E18, James Franck Str 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp LMU Munich, Dept Nucl Med, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[4] KETEK GmbH, Hofer Str 3, D-81737 Munich, Germany
关键词
positron emission tomography (PET); PET/MRI; preclinical PET; SiPM; performance evaluation; IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; PRECLINICAL TOMOGRAPH; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; PET/MRI SYSTEM; NEMA; MATRIX; SENSITIVITY; STANDARDS; EMISSION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/aa910d
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
MADPET4 is the first small animal PET insert with two layers of individually read out crystals in combination with silicon photomultiplier technology. It has a novel detector arrangement, in which all crystals face the center of field of view transaxially. In this work, the PET performance of MADPET4 was evaluated and compared to other preclinical PET scanners using the NEMA NU 4 measurements, followed by imaging a mouse-size hot-rod resolution phantom and two in vivo simultaneous PET/MRI scans in a 7 T MRI scanner. The insert had a peak sensitivity of 0.49%, using an energy threshold of 350 keV. A uniform transaxial resolution was obtained up to 15 mm radial offset from the axial center, using filtered back-projection with single-slice rebinning. The measured average radial and tangential resolutions (FWHM) were 1.38 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively. The 1.2 mm rods were separable in the hot-rod phantom using an iterative image reconstruction algorithm. The scatter fraction was 7.3% and peak noise equivalent count rate was 15.5 kcps at 65.1 MBq of activity. The FDG uptake in a mouse heart and brain were visible in the two in vivo simultaneous PET/MRI scans without applying image corrections. In conclusion, the insert demonstrated a good overall performance and can be used for small animal multi-modal research applications.
引用
收藏
页码:8671 / 8692
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MR-compatibility assessment of MADPET4: a study of interferences between an SiPM-based PET insert and a 7 T MRI system
    Omidvari, Negar
    Topping, Geoffrey
    Cabello, Jorge
    Paul, Stephan
    Schwaiger, Markus
    Ziegler, Sibylle, I
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (09)
  • [2] Performance of a PET Insert for High-Resolution Small-Animal PET/MRI at 7 Tesla
    Stortz, Greg
    Thiessen, Jonathan D.
    Bishop, Daryl
    Khan, Muhammad Salman
    Kozlowski, Piotr
    Retiere, Fabrice
    Schellenberg, Graham
    Shams, Ehsan
    Zhang, Xuezhu
    Thompson, Christopher J.
    Goertzen, Andrew L.
    Sossi, Vesna
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (03) : 536 - 542
  • [3] Performance evaluation of a PET insert for preclinical MRI in stand-alone PET and simultaneous PET–MRI modes
    Gaelle Emvalomenos
    Sofie Trajanovska
    Binh T. T. Pham
    Peter Doughty
    Jerome Burnet
    Isabelle Smith
    Ruslan Garipov
    Marie-Claude Gregoire
    Nana Sunn
    John McGrath
    Steven R. Meikle
    EJNMMI Physics, 8
  • [4] PET performance evaluation of the small-animal Hyperion IID PET/MRI insert based on the NEMA NU-4 standard
    Hallen, Patrick
    Schug, David
    Weissler, Bjoern
    Gebhardt, Pierre
    Salomon, Andre
    Kiessling, Fabian
    Schulz, Volkmar
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2018, 4 (06):
  • [5] Performance evaluation of a PET insert for preclinical MRI in stand-alone PET and simultaneous PET-MRI modes
    Emvalomenos, Gaelle
    Trajanovska, Sofie
    Pham, Binh T. T.
    Doughty, Peter
    Burnet, Jerome
    Smith, Isabelle
    Garipov, Ruslan
    Gregoire, Marie-Claude
    Sunn, Nana
    McGrath, John
    Meikle, Steven R.
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [6] Performance Evaluation of the Small-Animal nanoScan PET/MRI System
    Nagy, Kalman
    Toth, Miklos
    Major, Peter
    Patay, Gergely
    Egri, Gyozo
    Haggkvist, Jenny
    Varrone, Andrea
    Farde, Lars
    Halldin, Christer
    Gulyas, Balazs
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (10) : 1825 - 1832
  • [7] Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner
    Huisman, Marc C.
    Reder, Sybille
    Weber, Axel W.
    Ziegler, Sibylle I.
    Schwaiger, Markus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (04) : 532 - 540
  • [8] Performance evaluation of the Philips MOSAIC small animal PET scanner
    Marc C. Huisman
    Sybille Reder
    Axel W. Weber
    Sibylle I. Ziegler
    Markus Schwaiger
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007, 34 : 532 - 540
  • [9] MR-compatibility of a high-resolution small animal PET insert operating inside a 7 T MRI
    Thiessen, J. D.
    Shams, E.
    Stortz, G.
    Schellenberg, G.
    Bishop, D.
    Khan, M. S.
    Kozlowski, P.
    Retiere, F.
    Sossi, V.
    Thompson, C. J.
    Goertzen, A. L.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (22) : 7934 - 7956
  • [10] Characterization of a preclinical PET insert in a 7 tesla MRI scanner: beyond NEMA testing
    Gsell, Willy
    Molinos, Cesar
    Correcher, Carlos
    Belderbos, Sarah
    Wouters, Jens
    Junge, Sven
    Heidenreich, Michael
    Vande Velde, Greetje
    Rezaei, Ahmadreza
    Nuyts, Johan
    Cawthorne, Christopher
    Cleeren, Frederik
    Nannan, Lise
    Deroose, Christophe M.
    Himmelreich, Uwe
    Gonzalez, Antonio J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (24)