Intranasal sedatives in pediatric dentistry

被引:16
作者
AlSarheed, Maha A. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Div Pediat Dent, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont Sci, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
DENTAL PATIENTS; PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS; LACERATION REPAIR; CROSSOVER TRIAL; MIDAZOLAM; CHILDREN; PREMEDICATION; PHARMACOKINETICS; SUFENTANIL; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.15537/smj.2016.9.15003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify the intranasal (IN) sedatives used to achieve conscious sedation during dental procedures amongst children. Methods: A literature review was conducted by identifying relevant studies through searches on Medline. Search included IN of midazolam, ketamine, sufentanil, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, haloperidol and loranzepam. Studies included were conducted amongst individuals below 18 years, published in English, and were not restricted by year. Exclusion criteria were articles that did not focus on pediatric dentistry. Results: Twenty studies were included. The most commonly used sedatives were midazolam, followed by ketamine and sufentanil. Onset of action for IN midazolam was 5-15 minutes (min), however, IN ketamine was faster (mean 5.74 min), while both IN sufentanil (mean 20 min) and IN dexmedetomidine (mean 25 min) were slow in comparison. Midazolam was effective for modifying behavior in mild to moderately anxious children, however, for more invasive or prolonged procedures, stronger sedatives, such as IN ketamine, IN sufentanil were recommended. In addition, ketamine fared better in overall success rate (89%) when compared with IN midazolam (69%). Intranasal dexmedetomidine was only used as pre-medication amongst children. While its' onset of action is longer when compared with IN midazolam, it produced deeper sedation at the time of separation from the parent and at the time of anesthesia induction. Conclusion: Intranasal midazolam, ketamine and sufentanil are effective and safe for conscious sedation, while intranasal midazolam, dexmedetomidine and sufentanil have proven to be effective premedications.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 956
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abrams R, 1993, Anesth Prog, V40, P63
[2]   A Comparative Evaluation of Intranasal Midazolam, Ketamine and their Combination for Sedation of Young Uncooperative Pediatric Dental Patients: A Triple Blind Randomized Crossover Trial [J].
Bahetwar, S. K. ;
Pandey, R. K. ;
Saksena, A. K. ;
Chandra, Girish .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2011, 35 (04) :415-420
[3]   A COMPARISON OF INTRANASAL SUFENTANIL AND MIDAZOLAM TO INTRAMUSCULAR MEPERIDINE, PROMETHAZINE, AND CHLORPROMAZINE FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION IN CHILDREN [J].
BATES, BA ;
SCHUTZMAN, SA ;
FLEISHER, GR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (04) :646-651
[4]  
Burstein A H, 1996, Anesth Prog, V43, P52
[5]  
Chhabra N, 2012, Minerva Stomatol, V61, P83
[6]   NASAL VERSUS ORAL MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION OF ANXIOUS CHILDREN UNDERGOING LACERATION REPAIR [J].
CONNORS, K ;
TERNDRUP, TE .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (06) :1074-1079
[7]  
Fuks Anna B., 1994, Pediatric Dentistry, V16, P301
[8]  
Fukuta O, 1993, J Clin Pediatr Dent, V17, P231
[9]  
Haas D A, 1996, Anesth Prog, V43, P1
[10]   A comparison of four sedation techniques for pediatric dental surgery [J].
Heard, Christopher ;
Smith, Jayson ;
Creighton, Paul ;
Joshi, Prashant ;
Feldman, Doron ;
Lerman, Jerrold .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (10) :924-930