An assessment of Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria for active surveillance of clinically low-risk prostate cancer patients

被引:4
作者
da Silva, Vitor [1 ]
Cagiannos, Ilias [1 ]
Lavallee, Luke T. [1 ,2 ]
Mallick, Ranjeeta [2 ]
Witiuk, Kelsey [2 ]
Cnossen, Sonya [2 ]
Eastham, James A. [3 ]
Fergusson, Dean A. [2 ]
Morash, Chris [1 ]
Breau, Rodney H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL | 2017年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANTIGEN DENSITY; JOHNS-HOPKINS; REPEAT BIOPSY; MEN; PROTOCOLS; OUTCOMES; PREDICTORS; CANDIDATES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.5489/cuaj.4093
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Active surveillance is a strategy to delay or prevent treatment of indolent prostate cancer. The Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria were developed to select patients for prostate cancer active surveillance. The objective of this study was to compare pathological findings from PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible clinically low-risk prostate cancer patients. Methods: A D'Amico low-risk cohort of 1512 radical prostatectomy patients treated at The Ottawa Hospital or Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre between January 1995 and December 2007 was reviewed. Pathological outcomes (pT3 tumours, Gleason sum >= 7, lymph node metastases, or a composite) and clinical outcomes (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] recurrence, secondary cancer treatments, and death) were compared between PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible cohorts. Results: The PRIAS-eligible cohort (n=945) was less likely to have Gleason score >= 7 (odds ratio [OR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.75), pT3 (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.31-0.55), nodal metastases (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.10-1.31), or any adverse feature (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.69) compared to the PRIAS-ineligible cohort. The probability of any adverse pathology in the PRIAS-eligible cohort was 41% vs. 56% in the PRIAS-ineligible cohort. At median follow-up of 3.7 years, 72 (4.8%) patients had a PSA recurrence, 24 (1.6%) received pelvic radiation, and 13 (0.9%) received androgen deprivation. No difference was detected for recurrence-free and overall survival between groups (recurrence hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% CI 0.46-1.09 and survival HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.36-1.47). Conclusions: Low-risk prostate cancer patients who met PRIAS eligibility criteria are less likely to have higher-risk cancer compared to those who did not meet at least one of these criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 243
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance study [J].
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Bul, Meelan ;
Roobol, Monique .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) :216-221
[2]   Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance [J].
Berglund, Ryan K. ;
Masterson, Timothy A. ;
Vora, Kinjal C. ;
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand D. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (05) :1964-1967
[3]   A Critical Analysis of the Long-Term Impact of Radical Prostatectomy on Cancer Control and Function Outcomes [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Moul, Judd W. ;
Schaeffer, Edward M. ;
Stief, Christian ;
Zorn, Kevin C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (04) :664-675
[4]   Prostate cancer incidence and mortality trends in 37 European countries: An overview [J].
Bray, F. ;
Lortet-Tieulent, J. ;
Ferlay, J. ;
Forman, D. ;
Auvinen, A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) :3040-3052
[5]   Predictors of Unfavourable Repeat Biopsy Results in Men Participating in a Prospective Active Surveillance Program [J].
Bul, Meelan ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Rannikko, Antti ;
Valdagni, Riccardo ;
Pickles, Tom ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (02) :370-377
[6]   Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance [J].
Busch, Jonas ;
Magheli, Ahmed ;
Leva, Natalia ;
Ferrari, Michelle ;
Kramer, Juergen ;
Klopf, Christian ;
Kempkensteffen, Carsten ;
Miller, Kurt ;
Brooks, James D. ;
Gonzalgo, Mark L. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (04) :517-521
[7]   Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[8]   Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort [J].
Dall'Era, Marc A. ;
Konety, Badrinath R. ;
Cowan, Janet E. ;
Shinohara, Katsuto ;
Stauf, Frank ;
Cooperberg, Matthew R. ;
Meng, Maxwell V. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Perez, Nanette ;
Master, Viraj A. ;
Carroll, Peter R. .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (12) :2664-2670
[9]   Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS) [J].
El Hajj, Albert ;
Ploussard, Guillaume ;
de la Taille, Alexandre ;
Allory, Yves ;
Vordos, Dimitri ;
Hoznek, Andras ;
Abbou, Claude Clement ;
Salomon, Laurent .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (01) :53-59
[10]   Prostate-specific Antigen Density Toward a Better Cutoff to Identify Better Candidates for Active Surveillance [J].
Ha, Yun-Sok ;
Yu, Jihyeong ;
Salmasi, Amirali Hassanzadeh ;
Patel, Neal ;
Parihar, Jaspreet ;
Singer, Eric A. ;
Kim, Jeong Hyun ;
Kwon, Tae Gyun ;
Kim, Wun-Jae ;
Kim, Isaac Yi .
UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (02) :365-371