Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using Variable Precision Rough Set Theory and TODIM Method

被引:29
作者
Li, Jing [1 ]
Fang, Hong [1 ]
Song, Wenyan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Complex Syst Anal Management & Decis, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rough sets; Decision making; Uncertainty; Fuzzy set theory; Risk management; Terminology; Open wireless architecture; Bounded rationality; failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA); TODIM; variable precision rough set theory; CRITICALITY ANALYSIS; REASONING APPROACH; RISK-EVALUATION; TOPSIS APPROACH; DECISION; UNCERTAINTY; SYSTEM; FMECA;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2019.2927654
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used tool of risk assessment to identify and eliminate failures of products and systems. However, the conventional FMEA has some defects, such as the same importance of risk factors, utilizing crisp numbers to evaluate failures without considering vagueness. Although fuzzy methods are used to improve the conventional FMEA, the fuzzy FMEA requires much priori information (e.g., fuzzy membership function), which cannot flexibly reflect the changes of a decision makers preference. In addition, most of the previous methods suppose that decision makers are totally rational without considering their psychological factors. Actually, FMEA members' judgments on the failure modes are often influenced by their bounded rationality. To solve those problems, an integrated FMEA model is proposed in this paper, which integrates the strength of variable precision rough set theory in handling vagueness and the merit of TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of Interactive and Multicriteria Decision Making) approach in manipulating bounded rationality of decision makers. Finally, the proposed method is validated with a case study of a steam valve system to demonstrate its effectiveness and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1256
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Fuzzy-based failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of a hybrid molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) and gas turbine system for marine propulsion [J].
Ahn, Junkeon ;
Noh, Yeelyong ;
Park, Sung Ho ;
Choi, Byung Il ;
Chang, Daejun .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2017, 364 :226-233
[2]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [J].
Braglia, M ;
Frosolini, M ;
Montanari, R .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (05) :425-443
[3]  
Braglia M., 2000, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V17, P1017, DOI [10.1108/02656710010353885, DOI 10.1108/02656710010353885]
[4]   An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA [J].
Carmignani, Gionata .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (04) :861-871
[5]   A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel [J].
Certa, Antonella ;
Hopps, Fabrizio ;
Inghilleri, Roberta ;
La Fata, Concetta Manuela .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 159 :69-79
[6]   In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS [J].
Chamodrakas, I. ;
Leftheriotis, I. ;
Martakos, D. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (01) :900-907
[7]   A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set in FMEA [J].
Chang, Kuei-Hu ;
Cheng, Ching-Hsue .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2010, 41 (12) :1457-1471
[8]   Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2009, 48 (01) :246-256
[9]   Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach [J].
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Poon, Gary Ka Kwai ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (06) :1768-1779
[10]  
Ching-Liang Chang, 1999, Kybernetes, V28, P1072, DOI 10.1108/03684929910300295