Better Together Launching and Nurturing a Community Stakeholder Committee to Enhance Care and Research for Asthma and COPD

被引:8
作者
Barn, Prabjit [1 ]
Rideout, Karen L. [1 ]
Lo, Winnie [2 ]
Josey, Dennis [2 ]
Vint, Zackari [1 ]
Sha, Cindy [1 ,3 ]
Hamilton, Clayon [4 ,5 ]
Hoens, Alison M. [6 ]
Shellington, Erin M. [1 ]
Joshi, Phalgun B. [1 ]
Carlsten, Christopher [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Legacy Airway Hlth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Legacy Airway Hlth Community Stakeholder Comm, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Sch Kinesiol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Fraser Hlth, Surrey, BC, Canada
[5] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
[6] Univ British Columbia, Dept Phys Therapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
asthma; Community Stakeholder Committee; COPD; patient engagement; PEIRS-22; research; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; IMPACT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.028
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Partnering with patients and community stakeholders to identify, design, undertake, and evaluate research is increasingly common. We describe our experience with creating and developing an ongoing Community Stakeholder Committee to guide lung health research for disease prevention and health care improvement. This committee is central to the integrated knowledge translation approach of Legacy for Airway Health, which is dedicated to preventing and improving care for lung diseases. Patient Engagement in Research (PEIR) aims to improve the relevance, quality, and implementation of research activities. Meaningful patient and community engagement in research remains challenging to enact. The committee was established in October 2019, just before the COVID-19 pandemic, and quickly adapted from inperson to virtual engagement activities. This change led to an increased focus on relationship-building and mutual support alongside other research and training activities. We conducted a baseline evaluation survey after 1 year (October 2020), using a modified version of the Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22). Whereas individual scores suggested varied levels of meaningful engagement within the committee, overall results indicated strong personal relationships and a sense of feeling valued and respected, as well as a desire for increased opportunities to contribute to research within the program. Overall, this experience offers lessons learned about the importance of spending time and effort to build relationships, particularly in a virtual context, and shows that meaningful engagement can be achieved even when personal contact is limited. These efforts are illustrated in successful grant applications, research involvement, and stronger personal relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 388
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research? [J].
Ashcroft, Joanne ;
Wykes, Til ;
Taylor, Joseph ;
Crowther, Adam ;
Szmukler, George .
JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 25 (01) :28-35
[2]   The importance of measuring the impact of patient-oriented research [J].
Aubin, Diane ;
Hebert, Marilynne ;
Eurich, Dean .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 191 (31) :E860-E864
[3]  
BC SUPPORT Unit, BC SUPPORT UN ADV PA
[4]   What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams? [J].
Black, Agnes ;
Strain, Kimberly ;
Wallsworth, Christine ;
Charlton, Sara-Grey ;
Chang, Wilma ;
McNamee, Kate ;
Hamilton, Clayon .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2018, 23 (03) :158-167
[5]   The Expert Patient and Chronic Respiratory Diseases [J].
Boulet, Louis-Philippe .
CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 2016
[6]  
Can-SOLVE CKD Network, LISTENING LEARNING L
[7]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2011, STRAT PAT OR RES
[8]   NIH 'roadmap' charts course to tackle big research issues [J].
Check, E .
NATURE, 2003, 425 (6957) :438-438
[9]   Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science [J].
Damschroder, Laura J. ;
Aron, David C. ;
Keith, Rosalind E. ;
Kirsh, Susan R. ;
Alexander, Jeffery A. ;
Lowery, Julie C. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
[10]   Patient engagement in research: a systematic review [J].
Domecq, Juan Pablo ;
Prutsky, Gabriela ;
Elraiyah, Tarig ;
Wang, Zhen ;
Nabhan, Mohammed ;
Shippee, Nathan ;
Brito, Juan Pablo ;
Boehmer, Kasey ;
Hasan, Rim ;
Firwana, Belal ;
Erwin, Patricia ;
Eton, David ;
Sloan, Jeff ;
Montori, Victor ;
Asi, Noor ;
Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14