Brain PET amyloid and neurodegeneration biomarkers in the context of the 2018 NIA-AA research framework: an individual approach exploring clinical-biomarker mismatches and sociodemographic parameters (vol 45, pg 616, 2020)

Purpose: [18F]FDG-PET and [11C]PIB-PET are validated as neurodegeneration and amyloid biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We used a PET staging system based on the 2018 NIA-AA research framework to compare the proportion of amyloid positivity (A+) and hypometabolism ((N)+) in cases of mild probable AD, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), and healthy controls, incorporating an additional classification of abnormal [18F]FDG-PET patterns and investigating the co-occurrence of such with A+, exploring [18F]FDG-PET to generate hypotheses in cases presenting with clinical-biomarker “mismatches.” Methods: Elderly individuals (N = 108) clinically classified as controls (N = 27), aMCI (N = 43) or mild probable AD (N = 38) were included. Authors assessed their A(N) profiles and classified [18F]FDG-PET neurodegenerative patterns as typical or non-typical of AD, performing re-assessments of images whenever clinical classification was in disagreement with the PET staging (clinical-biomarker “mismatches”). We also investigated associations between “mismatches” and sociodemographic and educational characteristics. Results: AD presented with higher rates of A+ and (N)+. There was also a higher proportion of A+ and (N)+ individuals in the aMCI group in comparison to controls, however without statistical significance regarding the A staging. There was a significant association between amyloid positivity and AD (N)+ hypometabolic patterns typical of AD. Non-AD (N)+ hypometabolism was seen in all A− (N)+ cases in the mild probable AD and control groups and [18F]FDG-PET patterns classified such individuals as “SNAP” and one as probable frontotemporal lobar degeneration. All A− (N)− cases in the probable AD group had less than 4 years of formal education and lower socioeconomic status (SES). Conclusion: The PET-based staging system unveiled significant A(N) differences between AD and the other groups, whereas aMCI and controls had different (N) staging, explaining the cognitive impairment in aMCI. [18F]FDG-PET could be used beyond simple (N) staging, since it provided alternative hypotheses to cases with clinical-biomarker “mismatches.” An AD hypometabolic pattern correlated with amyloid positivity. Low education and SES were related to dementia in the absence of biomarker changes. © 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.