The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial

被引:28
作者
Bessette, L. [1 ]
Davison, K. S. [1 ]
Jean, S. [2 ]
Roy, S. [2 ]
Ste-Marie, L. G. [3 ]
Brown, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Med, CHUL Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Inst Natl Sante Publ Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Diagnosis; Education; Fragility fracture; Intervention; Osteoporosis; Treatment; HIP FRACTURE; MULTIFACETED INTERVENTION; CASE-MANAGER; WRIST FRACTURE; CARE GAP; IMPROVES; WOMEN; INITIATION; RATIONALE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-011-1533-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study assessed whether osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after an osteoporotic fracture can be increased by providing osteoporosis reading material to patients and family doctors or by watching a videocassette about osteoporosis. Educating patients about osteoporosis had little impact on whether a woman received an osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment. Introduction The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of two education-based interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in women a parts per thousand yen50 years of age after fragility fracture. Methods Six to eight months after fracture, women were randomized into three groups: (1) control, (2) written materials, or (3) videocassette and written materials. Written materials for both the patient and physician detailed osteoporosis, fragility fracture, and available treatments; written materials for physicians were provided through patients. The educational videocassette presented similar information as the written material, but in greater depth. Rates of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment following intervention were compared among groups using survival analysis methods. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.0167. Results At randomization, 1,174 women were without osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment, and after follow-up, 12% of the control group, 15% of the written materials group (p = 0.073), and 16% (p = 0.036) of the videocassette and written materials group were diagnosed with osteoporosis (statistical comparisons to control). Treatment rates were 8% for the control group, 12% for the written materials group (p = 0.052), and 11% for the videocassette and written materials group (p = 0.157). At randomization, 1,314 women were without treatment and after follow-up therapy was initiated in 10% of the control group, 13% of the written materials group (p = 0.107), and 13% of the videocassette and written materials group (p = 0.238). Conclusions The educational interventions assessed in this trial were not satisfactory to increase osteoporosis diagnosis or treatment in recently fractured women to a clinically meaningful degree.
引用
收藏
页码:2963 / 2972
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, OST UPD
  • [2] The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture
    Bessette, L.
    Ste-Marie, L. -G.
    Jean, S.
    Davison, K. S.
    Beaulieu, M.
    Baranci, M.
    Bessant, J.
    Brown, J. P.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [3] Recognizing osteoporosis and its consequences in Quebec (ROCQ): Background, rationale, and methods of an anti-fracture patient health-management programme
    Bessette, Louis
    Ste-Marie, Louis-Georges
    Jean, Sonia
    Davison, K. Shawn
    Beaulieu, Michle
    Baranci, Mirela
    Bessant, Jennifer
    Brown, Jacques P.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 29 (02) : 194 - 210
  • [4] Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment
    Bogoch, ER
    Elliot-Gibson, V
    Beaton, DE
    Jamal, SA
    Josse, RG
    Murray, TM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (01) : 25 - 34
  • [5] Brown JP, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V167, pS1
  • [6] Osteoporosis quality indicators using healthcare utilization data
    Cadarette, S. M.
    Jaglal, S. B.
    Raman-Wilms, L.
    Beaton, D. E.
    Paterson, J. M.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (05) : 1335 - 1342
  • [7] Charalambous CP, 2002, INT J CLIN PRACT, V56, P620
  • [8] A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial
    Cranney, A.
    Lam, M.
    Ruhland, L.
    Brison, R.
    Godwin, M.
    Harrison, M. M.
    Harrison, M. B.
    Anastassiades, T.
    Grimshaw, J. M.
    Graham, I. D.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (12) : 1733 - 1740
  • [9] Factors predicting osteoporosis treatment initiation in a regionally based cohort
    Cranney, A.
    Tsang, J. F.
    Leslie, W. D.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 (09) : 1621 - 1625
  • [10] Osteoporosis Disease Management: The Role of the Orthopaedic Surgeon
    Dell, Richard
    Greene, Denise
    Schelkun, Steven R.
    Williams, Kathy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A : 188 - 194