Effect of colchicine on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Lan, Shao-Huan [1 ]
Hsu, Chi-Kuei [2 ]
Lai, Chih-Cheng [3 ]
Chang, Shen-Peng [4 ]
Lu, Li-Chin [5 ]
Hung, Shun-Hsing [6 ]
Lin, Wei-Ting [7 ]
机构
[1] Putian Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci & Med Technol, Putian, Peoples R China
[2] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Div Hosp Med, Dept Internal Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Yijia Pharm, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Putian Univ, Sch Management, Putian, Peoples R China
[6] Chi Mei Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Tainan 71004, Taiwan
关键词
Colchicine; COVID-19; mechanical ventilation; mortality; non-invasive ventilation; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2022.2096919
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim This meta-analysis aimed to assess the usefulness of colchicine in patients with COVID-19. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between database inception and November 12, 2021. Only RCTs that compared the clinical efficacy and safety of colchicine with other alternative treatments or placebos in patients with COVID-19 were included. Results Overall, 7 RCTs involving 16,024 patients were included; 7,794 patients were in the study group receiving colchicine and 8,230 were in the control group receiving placebo or standard treatment. The study and control groups had similar risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09; I (2) = 0%). No significant difference was observed between the study and control groups in terms of the need for non-invasive ventilation (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.03; I (2) = 0%), the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.32-1.32; I (2) = 58%), and length of hospital stay (mean difference, -0.42 days; 95% CI, -1.95 to 1.11; I (2) = 62%). In addition, colchicine was associated with significantly higher risks of gastrointestinal adverse events (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.56-2.11; I (2) = 0%) and diarrhoea (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.75-2.56; I (2) = 9%). Conclusions Colchicine does not improve clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19, so it did not support the additional use of colchicine in the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Key message Colchicine could not reduce the mortality of patients with COVID-19. No significant difference was observed between the colchicine and comparators in terms of the need for non-invasive ventilation, need for mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay. Colchicine was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:1956 / 1965
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Colchicine for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Cheema, Huzaifa Ahmad
    Jafar, Uzair
    Shahid, Abia
    Masood, Waniyah
    Usman, Muhammad
    Hermis, Alaa Hamza
    Naseem, Muhammad Arsal
    Sahra, Syeda
    Sah, Ranjit
    Lee, Ka Yiu
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of colchicine in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Mehta, Kedar Gautambhai
    Patel, Tejas
    Chavda, Paragkumar D.
    Patel, Parvati
    RMD OPEN, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [3] Effect of sofosbuvir-based treatment on clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hsu, Chi-Kuei
    Chen, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Wang-Chun
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Hung, Shun-Hsing
    Lin, Wei-Ting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2022, 59 (03)
  • [4] Effect of colchicine on mortality in patients with COVID-19 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zein, Ahmad Fariz Malvi Zamzam
    Raffaello, Wilson Matthew
    DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2022, 16 (02)
  • [5] The effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Chao-Hsien
    Wang, Cheng-Yi
    Wang, Ya-Hui
    Chen, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Kuang-Hung
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Wei, Yu-Feng
    Fu, Pin-Kuei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 15 (05) : 593 - 600
  • [6] Efficacy of remdesivir in patients with COVID-19: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Gebrie, Desye
    Getnet, Desalegn
    Manyazewal, Tsegahun
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [7] The Effect of Nitazoxanide on the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mohamed Abuelazm
    Ahmed Ghanem
    Ahmed K. Awad
    Ramadan Abdelmoez Farahat
    Fatma Labieb
    Basant E. Katamesh
    Basel Abdelazeem
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2022, 42 : 1031 - 1047
  • [8] The effect of intravenous immunoglobulins on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Chen, Wang-Chun
    Chen, Ching-Yi
    Wei, Yu-Feng
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2022, 20 (10) : 1333 - 1340
  • [9] The Effect of Nitazoxanide on the Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    Ghanem, Ahmed
    Awad, Ahmed K.
    Farahat, Ramadan Abdelmoez
    Labieb, Fatma
    Katamesh, Basant E.
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2022, 42 (12) : 1031 - 1047
  • [10] Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chiu, Leonard
    Lo, Chun-Han
    Shen, Max
    Chiu, Nicholas
    Aggarwal, Rahul
    Lee, Jihui
    Choi, Young-Geun
    Lam, Henry
    Prsic, Elizabeth Horn
    Chow, Ronald
    Shin, Hyun Joon
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):