Prospect theory based method for heterogeneous group decision making with hybrid truth degrees of alternative comparisons

被引:55
作者
Wan, Shu-Ping [1 ]
Zou, Wenchang [1 ]
Dong, Jiu-Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat Technol, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Decision analysis; Multi-attribute group decision making; Prospect theory; Linear Programming Technique for; Multidimensional Analysis of Preference; Heterogeneous information; PREFERENCE REPRESENTATION STRUCTURES; MATHEMATICAL-PROGRAMMING METHOD; MULTIDIMENSIONAL-ANALYSIS; INCOMPLETE PREFERENCE; FUZZY; CONSENSUS; INFORMATION; FRAMEWORK; MECHANISM; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2020.106285
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper develops a new prospect theory based method for heterogeneous multi-attribute group decision making with hybrid fuzzy truth degrees of alternative comparisons. The heterogeneous evaluations of attributes are expressed by intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs), trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TrFNs), intervals, real numbers and probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs), respectively. The fuzzy truth degrees contain five kinds of different forms: HFSs, IFSs, TrFNs, intervals and PLTSs. Firstly, based on prospect theory, the individual overall prospect value of alternative is defined considering the positive ideal solution (PIS) and negative ideal solution (NIS) simultaneously. Then, a multi-objective fuzzy program of maximizing all the importance of preference relations is built to determine the decision makers' weights. The group consistency index (GCI) and group inconsistency index (GICI) are defined using the overall prospect values of alternatives. By minimizing GICI and maximizing GCI, a bi-objective hybrid fuzzy program is constructed to acquire the attribute weights, PIS, and NIS simultaneously. Employing the defuzzified technology, the bi-objective hybrid fuzzy program is converted into a single objective crisp program for resolution. Subsequently, the collective overall prospect values are computed to generate the collective ranking of alternatives. An example is analyzed to validate the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[2]  
Chen S.M., 1994, HANDLING MULTICRITER
[3]   Deriving heterogeneous experts weights from incomplete linguistic preference relations based on uninorm consistency [J].
Cheng, Dong ;
Zhou, Zhili ;
Cheng, Faxin ;
Wang, Juan .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 150 :150-165
[4]   A framework for context-aware heterogeneous group decision making in business processes [J].
De Maio, Carmen ;
Fenza, Giuseppe ;
Loia, Vincenzo ;
Orciuoli, Francesco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2016, 102 :39-50
[5]   Virtual enterprise partner selection integrating LINMAP and TOPSIS [J].
Dong, Jiu-Ying ;
Wan, Shu-Ping .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2016, 67 (10) :1288-1308
[6]   Consensus building in multiperson decision making with heterogeneous preference representation structures: A perspective based on prospect theory [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Luo, Nan ;
Liang, Haiming .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 35 :898-910
[7]   Multiperson decision making with different preference representation structures: A direct consensus framework and its properties [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Zhang, Hengjie .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 58 :45-57
[8]  
Dubois D., 1980, FUZZY SET SYST
[9]   A series of score functions for hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Farhadinia, B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 277 :102-110
[10]   Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Martínez, L ;
Sánchez, PJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 166 (01) :115-132