Application of model free active disturbance rejection controller in nuclear reactor power control

被引:25
作者
Sun, Aodi [1 ]
Pu Songmao [1 ]
He, Zhengxi [2 ]
Xiao, Kai [2 ]
Sun, Peiwei [1 ]
Wang, Pengfei [1 ]
Wei, Xinyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Shaanxi Engn Res Ctr Adv Nucl Energy, Key Lab Adv Nucl Energy & Technol, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Nucl Power Inst China, Sci & Technol Reactor Syst Design Technol Lab, Chengdu 610213, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nuclear reactor power control; Model-free active disturbance rejection control; Model adaptability; Robustness; PID;
D O I
10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103907
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The power control of nuclear reactors is the key to the safe operation of nuclear reactors. At present, PID controllers are still used in most industrial control. Although PID has the advantages of simple design and easy parameter tuning, it is still difficult to overcome its own shortcomings in the control of complex systems and large-scale parameter adjustment. Model-Free active disturbance rejection control(MF-ADRC) and PID are control method that do not require model information. This study compares the control performance of PID and MFADRC in nuclear power control. First, three different core models are established, and the power MF-ADRC and PID controller of LBFR is designed. The performance of MF-ADRC and PID is compared through reactive disturbance and wide-range power adjustment. Finally, the performance of MF-ADRC and PID control is compared through the control of different core power. The results show that MF-ADRC has the same parameters to be tuned as PID; PID is difficult to balance overshoot and settling time, but MF-ADRC does a good job in this aspect; PID and MF-ADRC have good robustness, In terms of results, MF-ADRC is more satisfactory.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Robust controller design for a class of nonlinear uncertain chemical processes
    Chen, CT
    Dai, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2001, 11 (05) : 469 - 482
  • [2] Chen H., 2020, POWER MANAG, V46, P114, DOI [10.16157/j.issn.0258-7998.191196, DOI 10.16157/J.ISSN.0258-7998.191196]
  • [3] Cong S., 2019, NUCL SCI ENG, V3, P337
  • [4] Approximation of linear active disturbance rejection control with PID control
    Cui W.-Q.
    Wang Y.-T.
    Tan W.
    [J]. Cui, Wen-Qing (2351964946@qq.com), 1781, South China University of Technology (37): : 1781 - 1789
  • [5] Fu C., 2017, ISA INSTRUM SOC AM T
  • [6] Tuning of linear ADRC with known plant information
    Fu, Caifen
    Tan, Wen
    [J]. ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 65 : 384 - 393
  • [7] On the centrality of disturbance rejection in automatic control
    Gao, Zhiqiang
    [J]. ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2014, 53 (04) : 850 - 857
  • [8] Guo W.Q., 2004, NUCL POWER ENG, V5, P399, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.0258-0926.2004.05.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.0258-0926.2004.05.004]
  • [9] Han Jing-qing, 2002, Control Engineering China, V9, P13
  • [10] Dynamic matrix control for thermal power of multi-modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor plants
    Jiang, Di
    Dong, Zhe
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 198