Critical review of generic and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life instruments

被引:239
作者
Both, Hilde
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
Busschbach, Jan
Nijsten, Tamar
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Dermatol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Med Psychol &Psychotherapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jid.5701142
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly important in patients with skin diseases. Despite the availability of a variety of instruments and new psychometric techniques, there is no consensus as to which HRQOL instruments are to be preferred in dermatology. The objective of this review is to evaluate the generic HRQOL measures (i.e., health profiles) that have been used in dermatology (Short-Form-36 (SF-36) and -12, NHP, SIP, World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-100 and -BREF) and all dermatology-specific HRQOL measures (Dermatology Life Questionnaire Index, Skindex-29, -16, and -17, Dermatology Quality of Life Scales, and Dermatology-Specific Quality of Life). Criteria for evaluation were adapted from existing guidelines and included conceptual and measurement model, reliability, validity, responsiveness, item functioning, meaning of scores, administrative burden, respondent burden, the availability of alternative forms, and of cultural and language adaptations. Furthermore, an overview of skin diseases in which the included HRQOL tools have been used is presented. Although the selection of the appropriate HRQOL instrument remains a trade-off between various psychometric properties and research objectives, for now, we recommend the combination of SF-36 and Skindex-29 as the instruments of choice in dermatology. Promising new instruments for future research are the WHOQOL and the Skindex-17.
引用
收藏
页码:2726 / 2739
页数:14
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]   Further evidence of the validity and reliability of the Skindex-29: An Italian study on 2,242 dermatological outpatients [J].
Abeni, D ;
Picardi, A ;
Pasquini, P ;
Melchi, CF ;
Chren, MM .
DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 204 (01) :43-49
[2]   Responsiveness of the Dermatology-specific Quality of Life (DSQL) instrument to treatment for acne vulgaris in a placebo-controlled clinical trial [J].
Anderson, R ;
Rajagopalan, R .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1998, 7 (08) :723-734
[3]   A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research [J].
Anderson, RT ;
Aaronson, NK ;
Bullinger, M ;
McBee, WL .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 10 (04) :336-355
[4]   Development and validation of a quality of life instrument for cutaneous diseases [J].
Anderson, RT ;
Rajagopalan, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1997, 37 (01) :41-50
[5]   Health-related quality of life outcomes measures [J].
Andresen, EM ;
Meyers, AR .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S30-S45
[6]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[7]   Quality of life measures in psoriasis: a critical appraisal of their quality [J].
Ashcroft, DM ;
Po, ALW ;
Williams, HC ;
Griffiths, CEM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 23 (05) :391-398
[8]   German adaptation of the Skindex-29 questionnaire on quality of life in dermatology:: Validation and clinical results [J].
Augustin, M ;
Wenninger, K ;
Amon, U ;
Schroth, MJ ;
Küster, W ;
Chren, M ;
Kupfer, J ;
Gieler, U .
DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 209 (01) :14-20
[9]  
Badia X, 1999, BRIT J DERMATOL, V141, P698
[10]   Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes [J].
Balkrishnan, R ;
McMichael, AJ ;
Hu, JY ;
Camacho, FT ;
Shew, KR ;
Bouloc, A ;
Rapp, SR ;
Feldman, SR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 45 (02) :111-115