Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients

被引:21
作者
Bleeker, Nils Jan [1 ]
Reininga, Inge H. F. [1 ]
van de Wall, Bryan J. M. [2 ]
Hendrickx, Laurent A. M. [3 ,4 ]
Beeres, Frank J. P. [2 ]
ten Duis, Kaj [1 ]
Doornberg, Job N. [1 ,3 ]
Jaarsma, Ruurd L. [3 ]
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. [4 ]
IJpma, Frank F. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthopaed Trauma Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Cantonal Hosp Lucerne LUKS, Dept Orthopaed Trauma Surg, Luzern, Switzerland
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Trauma Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sci AMS, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
intramedullary nailing; tibia fractures; suprapatellar; infrapatellar; anterior knee pain; complications; physical functioning; general quality of life; ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN; SHAFT FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; INSERTION; RETROPATELLAR; PARAPATELLAR; MALALIGNMENT; FIXATION; ETIOLOGY; POSITION;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000002043
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of suprapatellar (SP)-nailing versus infrapatellar (IP)-nailing of tibia fractures in anterior knee pain, complications (retropatellar chondropathy, infection, and malalignment) and physical functioning and quality of life. A clinical question-driven and thorough systematic review of current literature is provided. Data source: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies published between 2010 and 2020 relating to SP and IP-nailing of tibia fractures. The study is performed in concordance with PRISMA-guidelines. Study selection: Studies eligible for inclusion were randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on outcomes of interest. Data extraction: Data extraction was performed independently by 2 assessors. Methodological quality and risk of bias was assessed according to the guidelines of the McMaster Critical Appraisal. Data synthesis: Continuous variables are presented as means with SD and dichotomous variables as frequency and percentages. The weighted mean, standardized weighted mean differences, and 95% confidence interval were calculated. A pooled analysis could not be performed because of differences in outcome measures, time-points, and heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen studies with 1447 patients were analyzed. The weighted incidence of anterior knee pain was 29% after SP-nailing and 39% after IP-nailing, without reported significance. There was a significant lower rate of malalignment after the SP-approach (4% vs. 26%) with small absolute differences in all planes. No substantial differences were observed in retropatellar chondropathy, infection, physical functioning, and quality of life. Conclusions: This systematic review does not reveal superiority of either technique in any of the respective outcomes of interest. Definitive choice should depend on the surgeon's experience and available resources.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 400
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   Incidence of Knee Pain Beyond 1 Year: Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Approach for Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia [J].
Isaac, Marckenley ;
O'Toole, Robert V. ;
Udogwu, Ugo ;
Connelly, Daniel ;
Baker, Mitchell ;
Lebrun, Christopher T. ;
Manson, Theodore T. ;
Zomar, Mauri ;
O'Hara, Nathan N. ;
Slobogean, Gerard P. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2019, 33 (09) :438-442
[22]   Radiologic Outcome and Patient-Reported Function After Intramedullary Nailing: A Comparison of the Retropatellar and Infrapatellar Approach [J].
Jones, Mark ;
Parry, Michael ;
Whitehouse, Michael ;
Mitchell, Steven .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2014, 28 (05) :256-262
[23]   Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia [J].
Katsoulis, E. ;
Court-Brown, C. ;
Giannoudis, P. V. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (05) :576-580
[24]  
Kellam JF, 2018, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V32, pS1, DOI [10.1097/BOT.0000000000001062, 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063]
[25]  
Law M, 1998, GUIDEL CRIT REV FORM, P1
[26]   Long-term follow-up of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing [J].
Lefaivre, Kelly A. ;
Guy, Pierre ;
Chan, Holman ;
Blachut, Piotr A. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2008, 22 (08) :525-529
[27]   Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve, a possible cause for anterior knee pain after tibial nailing? [J].
Leliveld, M. S. ;
Verhofstad, M. H. J. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (06) :779-783
[28]   Tibial nailing using a suprapatellar rather than an infrapatellar approach significantly reduces anterior knee pain postoperatively: a multicentre clinical trial [J].
MacDonald, D. R. W. ;
Caba-Doussoux, P. ;
Carnegie, C. A. ;
Escriba, L. ;
Forward, D. P. ;
Graf, M. ;
Johnstone, A. J. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (09) :1138-1143
[29]   The Aberdeen Weight-Bearing Test (Knee): a new objective test for anterior knee discomfort [J].
MacDonald, David Robert Walker ;
Rehman, Haroon ;
Carnegie, Carol Ann ;
Tomas-Hernandez, Jordi ;
Johnstone, Alan John .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2020, 46 (01) :93-98
[30]   Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 [J].
Mangram, AJ ;
Horan, TC ;
Pearson, ML ;
Silver, LC ;
Jarvis, WR .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) :250-278