Discourses shaping the language-in-education policy and foreign language education in Nepal: an intersectional perspective

被引:5
作者
Poudel, Prem Prasad [1 ]
Choi, Tae-Hee [1 ]
机构
[1] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Educ Policy & Leadership, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Discourses; intersectionality; medium of instruction; foreign language education; linguistic diversity; ENGLISH; COMMODIFICATION; INSTRUCTION; AGENCY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1080/14664208.2021.2013063
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Language policy and planning in Nepal has been contested due to the co-existence of multiple contradictory discourses concerning teaching and learning of local, national, foreign, and international languages. Recently a multilingual policy was issued to create space for the once-banned ethnic/indigenous languages in public schooling, further complexifying the landscape. A few studies have paid attention to teaching and learning of the lesser taught ethnic/indigenous and foreign languages; however, what discursive orientations have contributed towards enabling (or constraining) the use of such languages in education and how have yet to receive scholarly attention. Framed by the perspectives of the intersectionality of discourses, and drawing on in-depth interviews with policymakers, headteachers, teachers, students, and their parents of five schools of Nepal, this paper concludes that the interplay between broader discourses such as globalisation, neoliberal marketisation and nationalism has played a significant role in shaping language policy decisions and localised practice of language(s). It also reveals that the spaces for ethnic/indigenous languages in education are delimited, in preference of English, Nepali, and other emerging foreign languages, leading to their further marginalisation. Such trends diminish the potential use of lesser taught languages, threatening Nepal's multilingual education policy towards sustaining existing linguistic diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 506
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, HIMALAYAN TIMES 0312
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, National Report
[3]   Toward an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Educational Equity and Difference: The Case of the Racialization of Ability [J].
Artiles, Alfredo J. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2011, 40 (09) :431-445
[4]  
Awasthi L.D., 2011, English language education in South Asia: From policy to pedagogy, P73
[5]  
Ball S. J., 1993, DISCOURSE STUDIES CU, V13, P10, DOI DOI 10.1080/0159630930130203
[6]   Making policy with 'good ideas': policy networks and the 'intellectuals' of New Labour [J].
Ball, Stephen J. ;
Exley, Sonia .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY, 2010, 25 (02) :151-169
[7]  
Bandhu CudaMani., 1989, Kailash-A Journal of Himalayan Studies, V15, P121
[8]  
Baral M.P, 2021, J WORLD LANGUAGES, V7, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0006, DOI 10.1515/JWL-2021-0006]
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[10]   Introduction: Scales analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics [J].
Canagarajah, Suresh ;
De Costa, Peter I. .
LINGUISTICS AND EDUCATION, 2016, 34 :1-10