Modified FOLFIRINOX versus sequential chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX) as a second-line treatment regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer: A real-world analysis

被引:2
作者
Tezuka, Shun [1 ]
Ueno, Makoto [1 ]
Oishi, Ritsuko [1 ]
Nagashima, Shuhei [1 ]
Sano, Yusuke [1 ]
Kawano, Kuniyuki [1 ]
Tanaka, Satoshi [1 ]
Fukushima, Taito [1 ]
Asama, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Konno, Naoki [1 ]
Kobayashi, Satoshi [1 ]
Morimoto, Manabu [1 ]
Maeda, Shin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kanagawa Canc Ctr, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Med Oncol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2022年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
FOLFIRI; FOLFIRINOX; FOLFOX; pancreatic cancer; second-line treatment; GEMCITABINE; PACLITAXEL; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4512
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Although second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer has been proven to have survival benefit, it is not clear which is the most preferred regimen. This study compared the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) and sequential chemotherapy (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX) as a second-line treatment regimen for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Method This was a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients who initiated treatment with mFOLFIRINOX or sequential chemotherapy from December 2014 to May 2019 as a second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer. The sequential chemotherapy group included all patients who initiated sequential chemotherapy. For efficacy analysis, the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of all patients, excluding those with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. For safety analysis, we assessed the incidence of grade >= 3 adverse events in all patients. Results Seventy-four patients (mFOLFIRINOX group, n = 44; sequential chemotherapy group, n = 30) were included. OS tended to be slightly prolonged in the mFOLFIRINOX group than in the sequential chemotherapy group (median 10.6 [95% confidence interval {CI} 5.9-13.8] vs. 8.5 [95% CI 5.0-12.2] months; hazard ratio 1.40 [95% CI 0.71-2.71]). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 8.1% and 64.9%, respectively, in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 3.8% and 42.3%, respectively, in the sequential chemotherapy group. In safety analysis, the grade >= 3 rates of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and anorexia were 40.9%, 6.8%, and 18.2%, respectively, in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 3.3%, 0%, and 3.3%, respectively, in the sequential chemotherapy group. Conclusions Whereas efficacy tended to be slightly better in the mFOLFIRINOX group than in the sequential chemotherapy group, given the higher incidence of grade >= 3 adverse events with mFOLFIRINOX than with sequential chemotherapy, sequential chemotherapy is a regimen with better risk-benefit balance than mFOLFIRINOX, and can be considered a second-line treatment option for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1098
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, COMMON TERMINOLOGY C
  • [2] Second-line therapy after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or after gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Chiorean, E. Gabriela
    Von Hoff, Daniel D.
    Tabernero, Josep
    El-Maraghi, Robert
    Ma, Wen Wee
    Reni, Michele
    Harris, Marion
    Whorf, Robert
    Liu, Helen
    Li, Jack Shiansong
    Manax, Victoria
    Romano, Alfredo
    Lu, Brian
    Goldstein, David
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (02) : 188 - 194
  • [3] Multicenter phase. trial of modified FOLFIRINOX in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
    Chung, Moon Jae
    Kang, Huapyong
    Kim, Ho Gak
    Hyun, Jong Jin
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    Lee, Kwang Hyuck
    Noh, Myung Hwan
    Kang, Dae Hwan
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    Bang, Seungmin
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 10 (12) : 505 - 515
  • [4] FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
    Conroy, Thierry
    Desseigne, Francoise
    Ychou, Marc
    Bouche, Olivier
    Guimbaud, Rosine
    Becouarn, Yves
    Adenis, Antoine
    Raoul, Jean-Luc
    Gourgou-Bourgade, Sophie
    de la Fouchardiere, Christelle
    Bennouna, Jaafar
    Bachet, Jean-Baptiste
    Khemissa-Akouz, Faiza
    Pere-Verge, Denis
    Delbaldo, Catherine
    Assenat, Eric
    Chauffert, Bruno
    Michel, Pierre
    Montoto-Grillot, Christine
    Ducreux, Michel
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (19) : 1817 - 1825
  • [5] Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics
    Dumontet, Charles
    Jordan, Mary Ann
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2010, 9 (10) : 790 - 803
  • [6] New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
    Eisenhauer, E. A.
    Therasse, P.
    Bogaerts, J.
    Schwartz, L. H.
    Sargent, D.
    Ford, R.
    Dancey, J.
    Arbuck, S.
    Gwyther, S.
    Mooney, M.
    Rubinstein, L.
    Shankar, L.
    Dodd, L.
    Kaplan, R.
    Lacombe, D.
    Verweij, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) : 228 - 247
  • [7] PANCREOX: A Randomized Phase III Study of Fluorouracil/Leucovorin With or Without Oxaliplatin for Second-Line Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in Patients Who Have Received Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy
    Gill, Sharlene
    Ko, Yoo-Joung
    Cripps, Christine
    Beaudoin, Annie
    Dhesy-Thind, Sukhbinder
    Zulfiqar, Muhammad
    Zalewski, Pawel
    Do, Thuan
    Cano, Pablo
    Lam, Wendy Yin Han
    Dowden, Scot
    Grassin, Helene
    Stewart, John
    Moore, Malcolm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (32) : 3914 - +
  • [8] Overall survival and clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer in BRCA mutation carriers
    Golan, T.
    Kanji, Z. S.
    Epelbaum, R.
    Devaud, N.
    Dagan, E.
    Holter, S.
    Aderka, D.
    Paluch-Shimon, S.
    Kaufman, B.
    Gershoni-Baruch, R.
    Hedley, D.
    Moore, M. J.
    Friedman, E.
    Gallinger, S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 111 (06) : 1132 - 1138
  • [9] Kanat O, 2017, WORLD J CLIN ONCOL, V8, P329, DOI 10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.329
  • [10] FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: A subset analysis of data from a nationwide multicenter observational study in Japan
    Kobayashi, Noritoshi
    Omae, Katsuhiro
    Horita, Yosuke
    Ueno, Hideki
    Mizuno, Nobumasa
    Uesugi, Kazuhiro
    Sudo, Kentaro
    Ozaka, Masato
    Hayashi, Hideyuki
    Okano, Naohiro
    Kamei, Keiko
    Yamaguchi, Atsushi
    Kobayashi, Satoshi
    Suzuki, Shuhei
    Ishihara, Shin
    Uchiyama, Takashi
    Todaka, Akiko
    Fukutomi, Akira
    [J]. PANCREATOLOGY, 2020, 20 (07) : 1519 - 1525