Quantification of effective exoelectrogens by most probable number (MPN) in a microbial fuel cell

被引:21
作者
Heidrich, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
Curtis, Thomas P. [1 ]
Woodcock, Stephen [2 ]
Dolfing, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Math Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Microbial fuel cell; Inoculation; Most probable number; Wastewater treatment; GEOBACTER-SULFURREDUCENS; WASTE-WATER; BACTERIA; GROWTH; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRON; PCR;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.066
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The objective of this work was to quantify the number of exoelectrogens in wastewater capable of producing current in a microbial fuel cell by adapting the classical most probable number (MPN) methodology using current production as end point. Inoculating a series of microbial fuel cells with various dilutions of domestic wastewater and with acetate as test substrate yielded an apparent number of exoelectrogens of 17 per ml. Using current as a proxy for activity the apparent exoelectrogen growth rate was 0.03 h(-1). With starch or wastewater as more complex test substrates similar apparent growth rates were obtained, but the apparent MPN based numbers of exoelectrogens in wastewater were significantly lower, probably because in contrast to acetate, complex substrates require complex food chains to deliver the electrons to the electrodes. Consequently, the apparent MPN is a function of the combined probabilities of members of the food chain being present. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 30
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STANDARD METHODS EXA, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.37-2792
[2]   Agreement between amoA Gene-Specific Quantitative PCR and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Measurement of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria in Activated Sludge [J].
Baptista, J. D. C. ;
Lunn, M. ;
Davenport, R. J. ;
Swan, D. L. ;
Read, L. F. ;
Brown, M. R. ;
Morais, C. ;
Curtis, T. P. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 80 (19) :5901-5910
[3]  
Blodgett RJ, 2005, J AOAC INT, V88, P1227
[4]  
Cord-Ruwisch R, 1998, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V64, P2232
[5]   Syntrophy in microbial fuel cells [J].
Dolfing, Jan .
ISME JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (01) :4-5
[6]   Growth of Geobacter sulfurreducens under nutrient-limiting conditions in continuous culture [J].
Esteve-Núñez, A ;
Rothermich, M ;
Sharma, M ;
Lovley, D .
ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 7 (05) :641-648
[7]   Quantitative RT-PCR: Pitfalls and potential [J].
Freeman, WM ;
Walker, SJ ;
Vrana, KE .
BIOTECHNIQUES, 1999, 26 (01) :112-+
[8]   Electron and carbon balances in microbial fuel cells reveal temporary bacterial storage behavior during electricity generation [J].
Freguia, Stefano ;
Rabaey, Korneel ;
Yuan, Zhiguo ;
Keller, Jurg .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (08) :2915-2921
[9]   Sampling errors in the determination of bacterial or virus density by the dilution method [J].
Haldane, JBS .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1939, 39 (03) :289-293
[10]   Performance of a pilot scale microbial electrolysis cell fed on domestic wastewater at ambient temperatures for a 12 month period [J].
Heidrich, Elizabeth S. ;
Edwards, Stephen R. ;
Dolfing, Jan ;
Cotterill, Sarah E. ;
Curtis, Thomas P. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 173 :87-95