Computationally Efficient Optimization Method to Quantify the Required Surgical Accuracy for a Ligament Balanced TKA

被引:3
作者
Bartsoen, Laura [1 ]
Faes, Matthias G. R. [1 ]
Wesseling, Mariska [2 ]
Wirix-Speetjens, Roel [2 ]
Moens, David [1 ]
Jonkers, Ilse [3 ]
Sloten, Jos Vander [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Materialise NV, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Movement Sci Dept, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Ligaments; Implants; Strain; Surgery; Uncertainty; Computational modeling; Biological system modeling; Musculoskeletal model; surgical accuracy; total knee arthroplasty; uncertainty quantification; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TBME.2021.3069330
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: This study proposes a computationally efficient method to quantify the effect of surgical inaccuracies on ligament strain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). More specifically, this study describes a framework to determine the implant position and required surgical accuracy that results in a ligament balanced post-operative outcome with a probability of 90%. Methods: The response surface method is used to translate uncertainty in the implant position parameters to uncertainty in the ligament strain. The designed uncertainty quantification technique allows for an optimization with feasible computational cost towards the planned implant position and the tolerated surgical error for each of the twelve degrees of freedom of the implant position. Results: It is shown that the error does not allow for a ligament balanced TKA with a probability of 90% using preoperative planning. Six critical implant position parameters can be identified, namely AP translation, PD translation, VV rotation, IE rotation for the femoral component and PD translation, VV rotation for the tibial component. Conclusion: We introduced an optimization process that allows for the computation of the required surgical accuracy for a ligament balanced postoperative outcome using preoperative planning with feasible computational cost. Significance: Towards the research society, the proposed method allows for a computationally efficient uncertainty quantification on a complex model. Towards surgical technique developers, six critical implant position parameters were identified, which should be the focus when refining surgical accuracy of TKA, leveraging better patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:3273 / 3280
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
[2]   Predicting Dissatisfaction After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Study of 850 Patients [J].
Anakwe, Raymond E. ;
Jenkins, Paul J. ;
Moran, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (02) :209-213
[3]   Probabilistic finite element predictions of the human lower limb model in total knee replacement [J].
Arsene, C. T. C. ;
Gabrys, B. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2013, 35 (08) :1116-1132
[4]  
Awad M., 2015, EFFICIENT LEARNING M, V1st, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-94, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-94]
[5]   The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: how important is it? A systematic review of the literature [J].
Babazadeh, Sina ;
Stoney, James D. ;
Lim, Keith ;
Choong, Peter F. M. .
ORTHOPEDIC REVIEWS, 2009, 1 (02) :70-78
[6]   Pymoo: Multi-Objective Optimization in Python']Python [J].
Blank, Julian ;
Deb, Kalyanmoy .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :89497-89509
[7]   LIGAMENT-BONE INTERACTION IN A 3-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF THE KNEE [J].
BLANKEVOORT, L ;
HUISKES, R .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (03) :263-269
[8]   Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? [J].
Bourne, Robert B. ;
Chesworth, Bert M. ;
Davis, Aileen M. ;
Mahomed, Nizar N. ;
Charron, Kory D. J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) :57-63
[9]  
Chang C.-C., 2011, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, V2, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1961189.1961199, 10.1145/1961189.1961199]
[10]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197