Does 18fluoro-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography improve recurrence detection in patients treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative clinical follow-up?

被引:39
作者
Salaun, Pierre Y.
Abgral, Ronan
Querellou, Solene
Couturier, Olivier
Valette, Gerald
Bizais, Yves
Kraeber-Bodere, Francoise
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Brest, Dept Nucl Med, F-29200 Brest, France
[2] Univ Hosp Nantes, Dept Nucl Med, Nantes, France
[3] Univ Hosp Brest, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Brest, France
来源
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK | 2007年 / 29卷 / 12期
关键词
squamous cell carcinoma; head and neck cancer; positron emission tomography; fluorodeoxyglucose; recurrence;
D O I
10.1002/hed.20645
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of (18)fluoro-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG PET) in the detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) recurrence in patients with negative clinical follow-up. Methods. Whole-body (18)FDG-PET was performed in 30 patients treated for HNSCC without any clinical element for recurrence. Results. Twenty-one negative PET and 9 positive results were seen. One patient with abnormal F-18-FDG uptake in the laryngeal area did not have recurrent HNSCC (false positive). Eight had proven recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of HNSCC recurrence were 100% (8/8) and 95% (21/22), respectively. The positive predictive value was 89% (8/9). The negative predictive value was 100% (21/21). The overall accuracy was 97% (29/30). Conclusion. The results of our study confirm the high effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in assessment of HNSCC recurrence and suggest that it is more accurate than conventional physical examination follow-up alone, (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1120
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer [J].
Ang, KK ;
Trotti, A ;
Brown, BW ;
Garden, AS ;
Foote, RL ;
Morrison, WH ;
Geara, FB ;
Klotch, DW ;
Goepfert, H ;
Peters, LJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03) :571-578
[2]  
Bombardieri E, 2002, NUCL MED A, P75
[3]  
Fischbein NJ, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P1189
[4]   Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: When do the ends justify the means? [J].
Goodwin, WJ .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2000, 110 (03) :1-18
[5]  
GREVEN KM, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1355, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940815)74:4<1355::AID-CNCR2820740428>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-I
[7]   The dilemma of follow-up in head and neck cancer patients [J].
Haas, I ;
Hauser, U ;
Ganzer, U .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 258 (04) :177-183
[8]   Uses and limitations of FDG positron emission tomography in patients with head and neck cancer [J].
Hanasono, MM ;
Kunda, LD ;
Segall, GM ;
Ku, GH ;
Terris, DJ .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1999, 109 (06) :880-885
[9]  
Kitagawa Y, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P198
[10]   FDG-PET delayed imaging for the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence after radio-chemotherapy: comparison with MRI/CT [J].
Kubota, K ;
Yokoyama, J ;
Yamaguchi, K ;
Ono, S ;
Qureshy, A ;
Itoh, M ;
Fukuda, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (04) :590-595