Homologous Boosting with Adenoviral Serotype 5 HIV Vaccine (rAd5) Vector Can Boost Antibody Responses despite Preexisting Vector-Specific Immunity in a Randomized Phase I Clinical Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Sarwar, Uzma N. [1 ]
Novik, Laura [1 ]
Enama, Mary E. [1 ]
Plummer, Sarah A. [1 ]
Koup, Richard A. [1 ]
Nason, Martha C. [2 ]
Bailer, Robert T. [1 ]
McDermott, Adrian B. [1 ]
Roederer, Mario [1 ]
Mascola, John R. [1 ]
Ledgerwood, Julie E. [1 ]
Graham, Barney S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NIAID, Vaccine Res Ctr, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NIAID, Biostat Res Branch, Div Clin Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 09期
关键词
T-CELL RESPONSES; DNA VACCINE; HEALTHY-ADULTS; NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY; IMMUNOGENICITY EVALUATION; CANDIDATE VACCINE; MALARIA VACCINE; NEEDLE; SAFETY; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0106240
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Needle-free delivery improves the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines but is also associated with more local reactogenicity. Here we report the first comparison of Biojector and needle administration of a candidate rAd5 HIV vaccine. Methods: Thirty-one adults, 18-55 years, 20 naive and 11 prior rAd5 vaccine recipients were randomized to receive single rAd5 vaccine via needle or Biojector IM injection at 10(10) PU in a Phase I open label clinical trial. Solicited reactogenicity was collected for 5 days; clinical safety and immunogenicity follow-up was continued for 24 weeks. Results: Overall, injections by either method were well tolerated. There were no serious adverse events. Frequency of any local reactogenicity was 16/16 (100%) for Biojector compared to 11/15 (73%) for needle injections. There was no difference in HIV Env-specific antibody response between Biojector and needle delivery. Env-specific antibody responses were more than 10-fold higher in subjects receiving a booster dose of rAd5 vaccine than after a single dose delivered by either method regardless of interval between prime and boost. Conclusions: Biojector delivery did not improve antibody responses to the rAd5 vaccine compared to needle administration. Homologous boosting with rAd5 gene-based vectors can boost insert-specific antibody responses despite pre-existing vector-specific immunity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] DNA Vaccine Delivered by a Needle-Free Injection Device Improves Potency of Priming for Antibody and CD8+T-Cell Responses after rAd5 Boost in a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Graham, Barney S.
    Enama, Mary E.
    Nason, Martha C.
    Gordon, Ingelise J.
    Peel, Sheila A.
    Ledgerwood, Julie E.
    Plummer, Sarah A.
    Mascola, John R.
    Bailer, Robert T.
    Roederer, Mario
    Koup, Richard A.
    Nabel, Gary J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [2] Effect of therapeutic intensification followed by HIV DNA prime and rAd5 boost vaccination on HIV-specific immunity and HIV reservoir (EraMune 02): a multicentre randomised clinical trial
    Achenbach, Chad J.
    Assoumou, Lambert
    Deeks, Steven G.
    Wilkin, Timothy J.
    Berzins, Baiba
    Casazza, Joseph P.
    Lambert-Niclot, Sidonie
    Koup, Richard A.
    Costagliola, Dominique
    Calvez, Vincent
    Katlama, Christine
    Autran, Brigitte
    Murphy, Robert L.
    LANCET HIV, 2015, 2 (03): : E82 - E91
  • [3] Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial of VRC DNA and rAd5 HIV-1 Vaccine Delivery by Intramuscular (IM), Subcutaneous (SC) and Intradermal (ID) Administration (VRC 011)
    Enama, Mary E.
    Ledgerwood, Julie E.
    Novik, Laura
    Nason, Martha C.
    Gordon, Ingelise J.
    Holman, LaSonji
    Bailer, Robert T.
    Roederer, Mario
    Koup, Richard A.
    Mascola, John R.
    Nabel, Gary J.
    Graham, Barney S.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [4] A Phase IIA Randomized Clinical Trial of a Multiclade HIV-1 DNA Prime Followed by a Multiclade rAd5 HIV-1 Vaccine Boost in Healthy Adults (HVTN204)
    Churchyard, Gavin J.
    Morgan, Cecilia
    Adams, Elizabeth
    Hural, John
    Graham, Barney S.
    Moodie, Zoe
    Grove, Doug
    Gray, Glenda
    Bekker, Linda-Gail
    McElrath, M. Juliana
    Tomaras, Georgia D.
    Goepfert, Paul
    Kalams, Spyros
    Baden, Lindsey R.
    Lally, Michelle
    Dolin, Raphael
    Blattner, William
    Kalichman, Artur
    Figueroa, J. Peter
    Pape, Jean
    Schechter, Mauro
    Defawe, Olivier
    De Rosa, Stephen C.
    Montefiori, David C.
    Nabel, Gary J.
    Corey, Lawrence
    Keefer, Michael C.
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (08):