Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets

被引:40
作者
Northrup, Rodney G.
Berzins, David W.
Bradley, Thomas Gerard
Schuckit, William
机构
[1] Marquette Univ, Dept Gen Dent Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Marquette Univ, Dept Dev Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
关键词
bond strength; adhesive; self-ligating brackets; in vitro;
D O I
10.2319/022406-79
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strengths of two adhesives using two types of brackets: a conventional and a self-ligating bracket system. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were collected. The premolars were randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth. All three groups were direct bonded. Groups 1 and 2 used light-cured adhesive and primer (Transbond XT) with a conventional (Orthos) and a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2), respectively. Group 3 used a light-cured primer (Orthosolo) and a light-cured adhesive (Blugloo) with a self-ligating bracket (Damon 2). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 40 +/- 2 hours, after which they were debonded and inspected for Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scoring. Results: The mean shear bond strength was 15.2 MPa for group 1, 23.2 MPa for group 2, and 24.8 MPa for group 3. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test showed significant differences in bond strength (P <.001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3 but no significant difference (P >.05) between groups 2 and 3. A Weibull analysis demonstrated that all three groups provided sufficient bond strength with over 90% survival rate at normal masticatory and orthodontic force levels. A Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference (P >.05) in ARI scores among all three groups. Conclusions: All three groups demonstrated clinically acceptable bond strength. The Damon 2 self-ligating bracket exhibited satisfactory in vitro bond strength with both adhesive systems used.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 706
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH CRYSTAL-GROWTH CONDITIONING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ACID-ETCH ENAMEL PRETREATMENT [J].
ARTUN, J ;
BERGLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 85 (04) :333-340
[2]  
ATSU SS, 2003, ANGLE ORTHOD, V76, P855
[3]  
Bishara SE, 2004, ANGLE ORTHOD, V74, P400
[4]   Orthodontic bonding with varying curing time and light power using an argon laser [J].
Elvebak, Bryan S. ;
Rossouw, P. Emile ;
Miller, Barbara H. ;
Buschang, Peter ;
Ceen, Richard .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (05) :837-844
[5]  
Fox N A, 1991, Br J Orthod, V18, P125
[6]  
Fox N A, 1994, Br J Orthod, V21, P33
[7]  
Harradine N W T, 2003, J Orthod, V30, P262, DOI 10.1093/ortho/30.3.262
[8]   Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing [J].
Klocke, A ;
Kahl-Nieke, B .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (02) :139-144
[9]  
Linn BJ, 2006, ANGLE ORTHOD, V76, P289
[10]   VARIABLES INFLUENCING THE BOND STRENGTH OF METAL ORTHODONTIC BRACKET BASES [J].
MAIJER, R ;
SMITH, DC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1981, 79 (01) :20-34