Writing peer-reviewed articles with diverse teams: considerations for novice scholars conducting community-engaged research

被引:11
作者
Flicker, Sarah [1 ]
Nixon, Stephanie A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Fac Environm Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
community-based participatory research; collaboration; knowledge transfer; action research; methodology; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; CHALLENGES; DISSERTATIONS; PHOTOVOICE; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1093/heapro/daw059
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Given the growth of interdisciplinary and community-engaged health promotion research, it has become increasingly common to conduct studies in diverse teams. While there is literature to guide collaborative research proposal development, data collection and analysis, little has been written about writing peer-reviewed publications collaboratively in teams. This gap is particularly important for junior researchers who lead articles involving diverse and community-engaged co-authors. The purpose of this article is to present a series of considerations to guide novice researchers in writing for peer-reviewed publication with diverse teams. The following considerations are addressed: justifying the value of peer-reviewed publication with non-academic partners; establishing co-author roles that respect expertise and interest; clarifying the message and audience; using the article outline as a form of engagement; knowledge translation within and beyond the academy; and multiple strategies for generating and reviewing drafts. Community-engaged research often involves collaboration with communities that have long suffered a history of colonial and extractive research practices. Authentic engagement of these partners can be supported through research practices, including manuscript development, that are transparent and that honour the voices of all team members. Ensuring meaningful participation and diverse perspectives is key to transforming research relationships and sharing new insights into seemingly intractable health problems.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 161
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], METHODS COMMUNITY BA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, AHRQ EVIDENCE REPORT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, COPE REPORT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, ACTION RES DISSERTAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, COMMUNITY BASED PART
  • [6] The role and theoretical evolution of knowledge translation and exchange in public health
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Waters, Elizabeth
    Roberts, Helen
    Oliver, Sandy
    Popay, Jennie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 28 (04) : 384 - 389
  • [7] Bordeaux Bryan C, 2007, Prog Community Health Partnersh, V1, P281, DOI 10.1353/cpr.2007.0018
  • [8] Fieldwork Challenges: Lessons Learned From a North-South Public Health Research Partnership
    Casale, Marisa A. J.
    Flicker, Sarah
    Nixon, Stephanie A.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PRACTICE, 2011, 12 (05) : 734 - 743
  • [9] Modifying Photovoice for community-based participatory Indigenous research
    Castleden, Heather
    Garvin, Theresa
    Nation, Huu-Ay-Aht First
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 66 (06) : 1393 - 1405
  • [10] RESEARCHERS' PERSPECTIVES ON COLLECTIVE/COMMUNITY CO-AUTHORSHIP IN COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY INDIGENOUS RESEARCH
    Castleden, Heather
    Morgan, Vanessa Sloan
    Neimanis, Aelita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2010, 5 (04) : 23 - 32