Mesopic Functional Visual Acuity in Normal Subjects

被引:24
作者
Hiraoka, Takahiro [1 ]
Hoshi, Sujin [1 ]
Okamoto, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Okamoto, Fumiki [1 ]
Oshika, Tetsuro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
LASER PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; DRY EYE PATIENTS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; TONIC ACCOMMODATION; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; REACTION-TIMES; HIGH MYOPIA; VISION; LUMINANCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0134505
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To evaluate mesopic functional visual acuity (FVA) with a newly developed system in normal subjects and to compare the results with photopic FVA, sixty-eight healthy volunteers (24.03 +/- 4.42 [mean +/- standard deviation] years) were enrolled in this study. A commercially available FVA measurement system (AS-28; Kowa, Aichi, Japan) was modified to measure FVA under mesopic conditions as well as photopic conditions. Measurements were performed monocularly in photopic conditions during 60 seconds. After dark adaptation for 15 minutes, the same measurements were repeated in mesopic conditions. Outcomes included starting visual acuity (VA), FVA (the average of VAs), visual maintenance ratio (VMR), maximum VA, minimum VA, and numbers of blinks during the 60-second measurement session, and were compared between mesopic and photopic conditions. Starting VA was -0.11 +/- 0.08 and 0.39 +/- 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in photopic and mesopic conditions, respectively. FVA was -0.06 +/- 0.09 and 0.52 +/- 0.14 logMAR, VMR was 0.98 +/- 0.02 and 0.94 +/- 0.04, maximum VA was -0.15 +/- 0.06 and 0.33 +/- 0.12 logMAR, the minimum VA was 0.05 +/- 0.12 and 0.78 +/- 0.20 logMAR, and the number of blinks was 8.23 +/- 7.54 and 7.23 +/- 6.20, respectively. All these parameters except the number of blinks were significantly different between the two conditions (P < 0.001). Besides, the difference between maximum and minimum VAs and standard deviation of VA were significantly larger in mesopic than in photopic conditions (P < 0.001). This study revealed that not only overall visual function decline but also instability of vision under mesopic conditions even in healthy subjects.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[2]   Accommodation and acuity under night-driving illumination levels [J].
Arumi, P ;
Chauhan, K ;
Charman, WN .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1997, 17 (04) :291-299
[3]   Analysis of driver speeds under night driving conditions using a driving simulator [J].
Bella, Francesco ;
Calvi, Alessandro ;
D'Amico, Fabrizio .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2014, 49 :45-52
[4]   Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy - Part 2: Survey of 690 patients [J].
Brunette, I ;
Gresset, J ;
Boivin, JF ;
Pop, M ;
Thompson, P ;
Lafond, GP ;
Makni, H .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (09) :1790-1796
[5]   FLUCTUATIONS OF ACCOMMODATION UNDER STEADY VIEWING CONDITIONS [J].
CAMPBELL, FW ;
ROBSON, JG ;
WESTHEIMER, G .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1959, 145 (03) :579-594
[6]   SIGNIFICANCE OF FLUCTUATIONS OF ACCOMMODATION [J].
CAMPBELL, FW ;
WESTHEIMER, G ;
ROBSON, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1958, 48 (09) :669-670
[7]   FLUCTUATIONS IN ACCOMMODATION - A REVIEW [J].
CHARMAN, WN ;
HERON, G .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1988, 8 (02) :153-164
[8]  
Charman WN, 1997, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V17, P371, DOI 10.1016/S0275-5408(97)00014-8
[9]  
CHARMAN WN, 1978, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V55, P84
[10]  
Collins G., 1937, Br. J. Physiol. Opt, V1, P30