Integration of Gross Anatomy in an Organ System-Based Medical Curriculum: Strategies and Challenges

被引:52
作者
Brooks, William S. [1 ]
Woodley, Kristina T. C. Panizzi [2 ]
Jackson, James R. [2 ]
Hoesley, Craig J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Cell Dev & Integrat Biol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med Educ, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
gross anatomy education; embryology education; undergraduate education; preclinical courses; medical education; integrated curriculum; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; BASIC SCIENCES; UNITED-STATES; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; LESSONS; FACULTY; EXAMPLE;
D O I
10.1002/ase.1483
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The University of Alabama School of Medicine (UASOM) instituted a fully integrated, organ system-based preclinical curriculum in 2007. Gross anatomy and embryology were integrated with other basic science disciplines throughout the first two years of undergraduate medical education. Here we describe the methods of instruction and integration of gross anatomy and embryology in this curriculum as well as challenges faced along the way. Gross anatomy and embryology are taught through a combination of didactic lectures, team-based learning activities, and cadaveric dissection laboratories. Vertical integration occurs through third- and fourth-year anatomy and embryology elective courses. Radiology is integrated with anatomy instruction through self-study modules and hands-on ultrasound sessions. Our model of anatomy instruction is time efficient, clinically relevant, and effective as demonstrated by student performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination((R)) (USMLE (R)) Step 1 examination. We recommend that medical schools considering full integration of gross anatomy and embryology (1) carefully consider the sequencing of organ system modules, (2) be willing to sacrifice anatomical detail for clinical application, (3) provide additional electives to third- and fourth-year students, and (4) integrate radiology with anatomical education. Anat Sci Educ 8: 266-274. (c) 2014 American Association of Anatomists.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 274
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1910, CARNEGIE B
[3]   The Gross Anatomy Course: An Analysis of Its Importance [J].
Boeckers, Anja ;
Jerg-Bretzke, Lucia ;
Lamp, Christoph ;
Brinkmann, Anke ;
Traue, Harald C. ;
Boeckers, Tobias M. .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2010, 3 (01) :3-11
[4]   Curriculum integration = course disintegration: What does this mean for anatomy? [J].
Bolender, David L. ;
Ettarh, Rajunor ;
Jerrett, David P. ;
Laherty, Richard F. .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 6 (03) :205-208
[5]  
Brooks WS, 2014, TEAM BASED LEARNING, V2014, P9733
[6]   Should there be a national core curriculum for anatomy? [J].
Chapuis, Pierre ;
Fahrer, Marius ;
Eizenberg, Norman ;
Fahrer, Claude ;
Bokey, Les .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (7-8) :475-477
[7]  
Cook M., 2010, Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency
[8]   Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools [J].
Craig, Steven ;
Tait, Noel ;
Boers, David ;
McAndrew, Darryl .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (04) :212-216
[9]   Changes in anatomy instruction and USMLE performance: Empirical evidence on the absence of a relationship [J].
Cuddy, Monica M. ;
Swanson, David B. ;
Drake, Richard L. ;
Pawlina, Wojciech .
ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2013, 6 (01) :3-10
[10]   A unique, innovative, and clinically oriented approach to anatomy education [J].
Drake, Richard L. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2007, 82 (05) :475-478