Treatment effects of R-appliance and Anterior Inclined Bite Plate in Class II, Division I malocclusion

被引:5
|
作者
Showkatbakhsh, Rahman [1 ]
Meybodi, Shahin Emami [2 ]
Jamilian, Abdolreza [2 ]
Reza Fatahi Meybodi, Seyyed Amir [3 ]
Meybodi, Elham Morshedi
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Orthodont, Dent Branch, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Functional orthodontic appliances; Removable orthodontic appliances; Angle Class II malocclusion; Growth; TWIN-BLOCK APPLIANCE; FUNCTION REGULATOR; HERBST; HEADGEAR; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-77572011000600015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a differently designed functional appliance (R-appliance) and the Anterior Inclined Bite Plate (AIBP) in Class II Division I (Cl II Div I) cases. Material and Methods: Fifty patients (28 girls, 22 boys) were chosen for the study: 25 patients (13 girls, 12 boys) with mean age of 10.4 +/- 0.8 years were treated with R-appliance for 11 2 months, the other 25 patients (15 girls, 10 boys) with mean age of 9 +/- 1.2 years were treated with AIBP for 10 2 months. All patients had CI II Div I malocclusion due to mandibular deficiency. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the beginning (T-1, T-1) and end of the study (T-2, T-2). Results: Paired T-test showed that SNB had a significant increase in both groups. The same test revealed that IMPA was reduced in R-appliance for 3.1 +/- 4.7 (p<0.01), but it was increased for 0.1 +/- 5.1 (p<0.9) in AIBP group. T-test showed that the inter-group difference of IMPA was statistically significant (p<0.05). SNA showed an increase in both groups (p<0.9). Ar-B and Ar-Pog showed an increase in both groups and the differences between them were statistically significant. Conclusions: Mandibular advancement was achieved in both groups, but R-appliance achieved this result without lingual tipping of lower incisors.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 638
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: Is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis, Nikolaos
    Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
    Alexandropoulos, Evanggelos
    Haralabakis, Nikos B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (03) : 346 - 355
  • [32] 3D Evaluation of Upper Airway Morphological Changes in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion Using Sander Bite Jumping Appliance
    Faccioni, Paolo
    Butera, Andrea
    Bazzanella, Silvia
    Albanese, Massimo
    Gallo, Simone
    Pascadopoli, Maurizio
    Scribante, Andrea
    Pardo, Alessia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [33] Effects of twin-block appliance on the anatomy of pharyngeal airway passage (PAP) in class II malocclusion subjects
    Ghodke S.
    Utreja A.K.
    Singh S.P.
    Jena A.K.
    Progress in Orthodontics, 15 (1) : 2 - 8
  • [34] Severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion in an adolescent patient, treated with a novel sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance
    Li, Peilun
    Feng, Jing
    Shen, Gang
    Zhao, Ning
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (01) : 153 - 166
  • [35] Comparative Analysis of Dentoskeletal Changes of the Twin Block Appliance and the AdvanSync2 Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class-II Malocclusion in Pakistani Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ghaffar, Fareena
    Jan, Abdullah
    Akhtar, Obaid
    Mughal, Alaina T.
    Shahid, Rooma
    Shafique, Hafiza Z.
    Bibi, Khadija
    Mehmood, Sundas
    Afgan, Nimra
    Zaheer, Rumeesha
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 16 (03) : 680 - 687
  • [36] Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
    Spalj, Stjepan
    Tranesen, Kate Mroz
    Birkeland, Kari
    Katic, Visnja
    Pavlic, Andrej
    Vandevska-Radunovic, Vaska
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [37] Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Frankel II appliance. A prospective controlled study
    Silvestrini-Biavati, A.
    Alberti, G.
    Silvestrini-Biavati, F.
    Signori, A.
    Castaldo, A.
    Migliorati, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 13 (04) : 301 - 306
  • [38] Effectiveness of Bionator functional orthodontic appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusion in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Dongling
    Meng, Mingmei
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2025, 49 (02) : 38 - 50
  • [39] Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    Pavoni, Chiara
    Faltin, Kurt, Jr.
    McNamara, James A., Jr.
    Cozza, Paola
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (02) : 334 - 340
  • [40] Dentoskeletal and airway effects of the X-Bow appliance versus removable functional appliances (Frankel-2 and Trainer) in prepubertal Class II division 1 malocclusion patients
    Atik, Ezgi
    Gorucu-Coskuner, Hande
    Kocadereli, Ilken
    AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL, 2017, 33 (01): : 3 - 13