Treatment effects of R-appliance and Anterior Inclined Bite Plate in Class II, Division I malocclusion

被引:5
|
作者
Showkatbakhsh, Rahman [1 ]
Meybodi, Shahin Emami [2 ]
Jamilian, Abdolreza [2 ]
Reza Fatahi Meybodi, Seyyed Amir [3 ]
Meybodi, Elham Morshedi
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Orthodont, Dent Branch, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Functional orthodontic appliances; Removable orthodontic appliances; Angle Class II malocclusion; Growth; TWIN-BLOCK APPLIANCE; FUNCTION REGULATOR; HERBST; HEADGEAR; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1590/S1678-77572011000600015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a differently designed functional appliance (R-appliance) and the Anterior Inclined Bite Plate (AIBP) in Class II Division I (Cl II Div I) cases. Material and Methods: Fifty patients (28 girls, 22 boys) were chosen for the study: 25 patients (13 girls, 12 boys) with mean age of 10.4 +/- 0.8 years were treated with R-appliance for 11 2 months, the other 25 patients (15 girls, 10 boys) with mean age of 9 +/- 1.2 years were treated with AIBP for 10 2 months. All patients had CI II Div I malocclusion due to mandibular deficiency. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the beginning (T-1, T-1) and end of the study (T-2, T-2). Results: Paired T-test showed that SNB had a significant increase in both groups. The same test revealed that IMPA was reduced in R-appliance for 3.1 +/- 4.7 (p<0.01), but it was increased for 0.1 +/- 5.1 (p<0.9) in AIBP group. T-test showed that the inter-group difference of IMPA was statistically significant (p<0.05). SNA showed an increase in both groups (p<0.9). Ar-B and Ar-Pog showed an increase in both groups and the differences between them were statistically significant. Conclusions: Mandibular advancement was achieved in both groups, but R-appliance achieved this result without lingual tipping of lower incisors.
引用
收藏
页码:634 / 638
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Jamilian, Abdolreza
    Showkatbakhsh, Rahman
    Amiri, Shabnam Sheikholeslam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 354 - 358
  • [2] Treatment effects of R-Appliance and Frankel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions
    Showkatbakhsh, R.
    Castaldo, M. I.
    Jamilian, A.
    Padricelli, G.
    Hanzayi, M. Fahimi
    Cappabianca, S.
    Perillo, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 14 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [3] Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion
    Ghislanzoni, Luis Tomas Huanca
    Baccetti, Tiziano
    Toll, Douglas
    Defraia, Efisio
    McNamara, James A., Jr.
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2013, 35 (03) : 394 - 400
  • [4] Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion
    Cozza, Paola
    Baccetti, Tiziano
    Mucedero, Manuela
    Pavoni, Chiara
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (03) : 300 - 310
  • [5] The correction of class II, division 1 malocclusion with bionator headgear combination appliance
    Mao Jing
    Zhao Hong
    Current Medical Science, 1997, 17 (4) : 254 - 256
  • [6] New Solution in the Treatment of Children with Class II Malocclusion: Biblock Appliance
    Cakmak, B.
    Rubendiz, M.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 27 (08) : 995 - 1003
  • [7] Effects of nutrition and hormones on functional appliance treatment outcome in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion
    Zhang, Xu
    Yi, Jianru
    Li, Yu
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2020, 9 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [8] Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects Induced by the Paolone-Kaitsas Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion: A Controlled Retrospective Study on Lateral Cephalograms
    Gavazzi, Camilla
    Franceschi, Debora
    Pierleoni, Felicita
    Barone, Valeria
    Kaitsas, Francesco
    Paolone, Maria Giacinta
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    Giuntini, Veronica
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [9] Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial
    Campbell, Ciara
    Millett, Declan
    Kelly, Niamh
    Cooke, Marie
    Cronin, Michael
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2020, 90 (02) : 202 - 208
  • [10] Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Barnett, Gregory A.
    Higgins, Duncan W.
    Major, Paul W.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (02) : 361 - 369