Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

被引:29
|
作者
Lopez, Cesar D. [1 ,2 ]
Gazgalis, Anastasia [1 ]
Boddapati, Venkat [1 ]
Shah, Roshan P. [1 ]
Cooper, John [1 ]
Geller, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] 622 W 168th St PH-11, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Artificial neural networks; Orthopedic surgery; Hip and knee arthroplasty; ALGORITHMS; PREDICT; REPLACEMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; INTELLIGENCE; PAYMENTS; ACHIEVE; WILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-making in TJA. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Analysis of variance testing with post-hoc Tukey test was applied to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the models. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 studies were included in this review. The application of AI/ML-based models and average AUC is as follows: cost prediction-0.77, LOS and discharges-0.78, readmissions and reoperations-0.66, preoperative patient selection/planning-0.79, adverse events and other postoperative complications-0.84, postoperative pain-0.83, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures and functional outcome-0.81. Significant variability in model AUC across the different decision support applications was found (P < .001) with the AUC for readmission and reoperation models being significantly lower than that of the other decision support categories. Conclusions: AI/ML-based applications in TJA continue to expand and have the potential to optimize patient selection and accurately predict postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated costs. On average, the AI/ML models performed best in predicting postoperative complications, pain, and patientreported outcomes and were less accurate in predicting hospital readmissions and reoperations. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transfusion after total knee arthroplasty can be predicted using the machine learning algorithm
    Jo, Changwung
    Ko, Sunho
    Shin, Woo Cheol
    Han, Hyuk-Soo
    Lee, Myung Chul
    Ko, Taehoon
    Ro, Du Hyun
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (06) : 1757 - 1764
  • [32] Accuracy of machine learning to predict the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Karimi, Amir H.
    Langberg, Joshua
    Malige, Ajith
    Rahman, Omar
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    Stone, Michael A.
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [33] Patients' decision making in total knee arthroplasty A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
    Barlow, T.
    Griffin, D.
    Barlow, D.
    Realpe, A.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (10): : 163 - 169
  • [34] Can minimal clinically important differences in patient reported outcome measures be predicted by machine learning in patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty? A systematic review
    Langenberger, Benedikt
    Thoma, Andreas
    Vogt, Verena
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [35] Optimal inputs for machine learning models in predicting total joint arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review
    Sanghvi, Parshva A.
    Shah, Aakash K.
    Hecht, Christian J.
    Karimi, Amir H.
    Kamath, Atul F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (08) : 3809 - 3825
  • [36] Applications of Machine Learning in Mechanised Tunnel Construction: A Systematic Review
    Shan, Feng
    He, Xuzhen
    Xu, Haoding
    Armaghani, Danial Jahed
    Sheng, Daichao
    ENG, 2023, 4 (02): : 1516 - 1535
  • [37] Artificial intelligence and machine learning | applications in musculoskeletal physiotherapy
    Tack, Christopher
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 39 : 164 - 169
  • [38] Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning inNeuroregeneration: A Systematic Review
    Mulpuri, Rajendra P.
    Konda, Nikhitha
    Gadde, Sai T.
    Amalakanti, Sridhar
    Valiveti, Sindhu Chowdary
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [39] Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review
    Rubén E Mújica Mota
    Rosanna Tarricone
    Oriana Ciani
    John FP Bridges
    Mike Drummond
    BMC Health Services Research, 12
  • [40] Determinants of demand for total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review
    Mota, Ruben E. Mujica
    Tarricone, Rosanna
    Ciani, Oriana
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Drummond, Mike
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12