Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

被引:29
|
作者
Lopez, Cesar D. [1 ,2 ]
Gazgalis, Anastasia [1 ]
Boddapati, Venkat [1 ]
Shah, Roshan P. [1 ]
Cooper, John [1 ]
Geller, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York Presbyterian, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] 622 W 168th St PH-11, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
ARTHROPLASTY TODAY | 2021年 / 11卷
关键词
Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Artificial neural networks; Orthopedic surgery; Hip and knee arthroplasty; ALGORITHMS; PREDICT; REPLACEMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; INTELLIGENCE; PAYMENTS; ACHIEVE; WILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2021.07.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modeling in hip and knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) is becoming more commonplace. This systematic review aims to quantify the accuracy of current AI- and ML-based application for cognitive support and decision-making in TJA. Methods: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted through the EMBASE, Medline, and PubMed databases using relevant keywords to maximize the sensitivity of the search. No limits were placed on level of evidence or timing of the study. Findings were reported according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Analysis of variance testing with post-hoc Tukey test was applied to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of the models. Results: After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 49 studies were included in this review. The application of AI/ML-based models and average AUC is as follows: cost prediction-0.77, LOS and discharges-0.78, readmissions and reoperations-0.66, preoperative patient selection/planning-0.79, adverse events and other postoperative complications-0.84, postoperative pain-0.83, postoperative patient-reported outcomes measures and functional outcome-0.81. Significant variability in model AUC across the different decision support applications was found (P < .001) with the AUC for readmission and reoperation models being significantly lower than that of the other decision support categories. Conclusions: AI/ML-based applications in TJA continue to expand and have the potential to optimize patient selection and accurately predict postoperative outcomes, complications, and associated costs. On average, the AI/ML models performed best in predicting postoperative complications, pain, and patientreported outcomes and were less accurate in predicting hospital readmissions and reoperations. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techniques and applications of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in education: a systematic review
    Forero-Corba, Wiston
    Bennasar, Francisca Negre
    RIED-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION A DISTANCIA, 2024, 27 (01):
  • [22] Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in the Imaging of Gliomas: A Systematic Review
    Alhasan, Ayman S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [23] Detection of Prosthetic Loosening in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Man-Soo
    Kim, Jae-Jung
    Kang, Ki-Ho
    Lee, Jeong-Han
    In, Yong
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (04):
  • [24] Applications of Machine Learning in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Vu, Erwin
    Steinmann, Nina
    Schroder, Christina
    Forster, Robert
    Aebersold, Daniel M.
    Eychmuller, Steffen
    Cihoric, Nikola
    Hertler, Caroline
    Windisch, Paul
    Zwahlen, Daniel R.
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [25] The application of machine learning to balance a total knee arthroplasty
    Verstraete, M. A.
    Moore, R. E.
    Roche, M.
    Conditt, M. A.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2020, 1 (06): : 236 - 244
  • [26] The Viability of an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Prediction Model to Determine Candidates for Knee Arthroplasty
    Houserman, David J.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Lombardi Jr, Adolph V.
    Fischetti, Chanel E.
    Duhaime, Erik P.
    Jain, Anant
    Crawford, David A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (10) : 2075 - 2080
  • [27] Enhanced Recovery After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty A Systematic Review
    Morrell, Aidan T.
    Layon, Daniel R.
    Scott, Michael J.
    Kates, Stephen L.
    Golladay, Gregory J.
    Patel, Nirav K.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (20) : 1938 - 1947
  • [28] Machine Learning Predicts Femoral and Tibial Implant Size Mismatch for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Polce, Evan M.
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Paul, Katlynn M.
    Levine, Brett R.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 8 : 268 - 277.e2
  • [29] Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review
    Buchlak, Quinlan D.
    Clair, Joe
    Esmaili, Nazanin
    Barmare, Arshad
    Chandrasekaran, Siva
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 32 (05) : 915 - 931
  • [30] Machine learning in shoulder arthroplasty a systematic review of predictive analytics applications
    Schneller, T.
    Kraus, M.
    Schatz, J.
    Moroder, P.
    Scheibel, M.
    Lazaridou, A.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2025, 6 (02): : 126 - 134