Sharing through Commitment: Organizational Justice and Trust as Antecedents of Knowledge Sharing between IT Professionals

被引:0
作者
Tsai, Mingtien [1 ]
Cheng, Naichang [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Business Administrator, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (ICOSCM 2010) | 2010年 / 4卷
关键词
Knowledge sharing; self-efficacy; trust; commitment; organizational justice; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE THEORY; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; MODEL; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Knowledge sharing is an important process in modern organizations, as successful knowledge sharing can result in shared intellectual capital, an increasingly important resource. In this paper, we study the influence of distinction is made between knowledge sharing self-efficacy and knowledge sharing intention. Based on relevant literature, we hypothesize that commitment, self-efficacy are both positively related to knowledge sharing intention. Organizational commitment as a mediator, we also hypothesize that organizational justice and trust positively influences commitment. Well-known and widely publicized findings from the literature are logically turned into hypotheses, proved or rejected through a well-constructed survey among 252 IT professionals. Our conclusion is that organizational justice and perceived trust are antecedents of organizational commitment, and that such commitment, in turn, influences the confidence and willingness to share knowledge. The results suggest the need for consideration of commitment as a mediator when encouraging individual to share knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 707
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks [J].
Abrams, LC ;
Cross, R ;
Lesser, E ;
Levin, DZ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2003, 17 (04) :64-77
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[3]   Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model [J].
Aryee, S ;
Budhwar, PS ;
Chen, ZX .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (03) :267-285
[4]  
Bandura A., 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[5]   Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate [J].
Bock, GW ;
Zmud, RW ;
Kim, YG ;
Lee, JN .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2005, 29 (01) :87-111
[6]   Knowledge-sharing dilemmas [J].
Cabrera, A ;
Cabrera, EF .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2002, 23 (05) :687-710
[7]   Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices [J].
Cabrera, EF ;
Cabrera, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 16 (05) :720-735
[8]   Groupware and teamwork in R&D: limits to learning and innovation [J].
Ciborra, CU ;
Patriotta, G .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1998, 28 (01) :43-52
[9]   Local learning from multinational plants: Knowledge transfers in the supply chain [J].
Crone, M ;
Roper, S .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2001, 35 (06) :535-548
[10]   Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review [J].
Cropanzano, R ;
Mitchell, MS .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (06) :874-900