QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE WORLD SEA PIRACY BY FUZZY AHP AND FUZZY TOPSIS METHODOLOGIES

被引:10
|
作者
Ozdemir, Unal [1 ]
Gineroglu, Abdulaziz [2 ]
机构
[1] Mersin Univ, Maritime Fac, Dept Maritime Business Management, Mersin, Turkey
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Marine Sci, Dept Marine Ecol, TR-61530 Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Piracy; Maritime Trade; Fuzzy AHP; Fuzzy TOPSIS; DECISION-MAKING; SELECTION; MODEL; EXTENSION; TRANSPORT; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.19272/201706703004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite to many conventions and regulations in force against sea piracy, the problem still threatens the security of the world sea transportations by affecting both the ship and the crew on board. Privateering and piracy, which are widely occurred, were analyzed within the context of the current study. The factors causing piracy incidents were first defined to propose practical and applicable solutions for the problem. The expert opinions on criteria set were analyzed by applying fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS techniques to determine the significance level and ranking the alternatives. Among all criteria the "economic insufficiency (C6)" was received the maximum score as the most effective cause of the sea piracy whereas the least effective factor was decided as "geographic location of the canals and straits that are in risky regions of the world (Cl)". While the most important alternative to offer a solution to this problem was established as "providing support local and regional authority in risky regions (A5)", the least important alternative was confirmed as "providing rehabilitations to individuals or groups" which have tendency toward privateering actions (A6).
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 448
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection
    Ertugrul, Irfan
    Karakasoglu, Nilsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (7-8) : 783 - 795
  • [22] Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection
    İrfan Ertuğrul
    Nilsen Karakaşoğlu
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 39 : 783 - 795
  • [23] A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods
    Sun, Chia-Chi
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) : 7745 - 7754
  • [24] A hybrid fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS model for evaluation of manufacturing relocation decisions
    Sequeira, Movin
    Adlemo, Anders
    Hilletofth, Per
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01) : 164 - 191
  • [25] An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS for E-commerce Evaluation
    Tran Thi Tham
    Hong-Phuc Nguyen
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 20 (02): : 82 - 95
  • [26] Comparative analysis of airline financial and operational performances: A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS integrated approach
    Bae, Ki-Hwan Gabriel
    Gupta, Aman
    Mau, Ronald
    DECISION SCIENCE LETTERS, 2021, 10 (03) : 361 - 374
  • [27] Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing
    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, Malgorzata
    Antosz, Katarzyna
    Wyczolkowski, Ryszard
    Mazurkiewicz, Dariusz
    Sun, Bo
    Qian, Cheng
    Ren, Yi
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (05)
  • [28] A Comparative Analysis between Fuzzy Topsis and Simplified Fuzzy Topsis
    Ahmad, Sharifah Aniza Sayed
    Mohamad, Daud
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (SKSM24): MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES EXPLORATION FOR THE UNIVERSAL PRESERVATION, 2017, 1870
  • [29] Player Selection for a National Football Team using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
    Pehlivan, Nimet Yapici
    Unal, Yener
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    JOURNAL OF MULTIPLE-VALUED LOGIC AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 32 (5-6) : 369 - 405
  • [30] A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection
    Nazim, Mohd.
    Mohammad, Chaudhary Wali
    Sadiq, Mohd.
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (12) : 10851 - 10870