Effect of a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt versus a lumbar support on walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial

被引:16
作者
Ammendolia, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Rampersaud, Y. Raja [3 ]
Southerst, Danielle [4 ]
Ahmed, Aksa [2 ]
Schneider, Michael [5 ]
Hawker, Gillian [6 ,7 ]
Bombardier, Claire [6 ,7 ]
Cote, Pierre [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, 4th Floor,155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Rebecca MacDonald Ctr Arthrit & Autoimmune Dis, 60 Murray St,Room L2-225, Toronto, ON M5T 3L9, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[4] NYU, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Occupat & Ind Ctr, Langone Hlth, 63 Downing St, New York, NY 10014 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, 4028 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Div Rheumatol, Dept Med, Med Sci Bldg,1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Med Sci Bldg,1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
[9] Univ Ontario, Fac Hlth Sci, UOIT CMCC Ctr Disabil Prevent & Rehabil, Inst Technol, 2000 Simcoe St North, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Intermittent claudication; LSS; Lumbar belt; Lumbar support; Nonoperative treatment; Randomized controlled trial; Walking; NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION; EPIDURAL PRESSURE; HISTORY; ABILITY; POSTURE; ADULT; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can impair blood flow to the spinal nerves giving rise to neurogenic claudication and limited walking ability. Reducing lumbar lordosis can increases the volume of the spinal canal and reduce neuroischemia. We developed a prototype LSS belt aimed at reducing lumbar lordosis while walking. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the short-term effectiveness of a prototype LSS belt compared to a lumbar support in improving walking ability in patients with degenerative LSS. STUDY DESIGN: This was a two-arm, double-blinded (participant and assessor) randomized controlled trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: We recruited 104 participants aged 50 years or older with neurogenic claudication, imaging confirmed degenerative LSS, and limited walking ability. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary measure was walking distance measured by the self-paced walking test (SPWT) and the primary outcome was the difference in proportions among participants in both groups who achieved at least a 30% improvement in walking distance from baseline using relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. METHODS: Within 1 week of a baseline SPWT, participants randomized to the prototype LSS belt group (n=52) and those randomized to the lumbar support group (n=52) performed a SPWT that was conducted by a blinded assessor. The Arthritis Society funded this study ($365,000 CAN) with salary support for principal investigator funded by the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation ($500,000 CAN for 5 years). RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in walking distance, but there was no significant difference between groups. The mean group difference in walking distance was -74 m (95% CI: -282.8 to 134.8, p=.49). In total, 62% of participants wearing the prototype LSS belt and 82% of participants wearing the lumbar support achieved at least 30% improvement in walking distance (relative risk, 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-1.3, p=.43). CONCLUSIONS: A prototype LSS belt demonstrated significant improvement in walking ability in degenerative LSS but was no better than a lumbar support. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 394
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] The effect of different lumbar belt designs on the lumbopelvic rhythm in healthy subjects
    Lariviere, Christian
    Caron, Jean-Maxime
    Preuss, Richard
    Mecheri, Hakim
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [22] Belt effects on lumbar sagittal angles
    Lee, YH
    Chen, CY
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (02) : 79 - 82
  • [23] Is surgery more effective than non-surgical treatment for spinal stenosis, and which non-surgical treatment is more effective? A systematic review
    May, Stephen
    Comer, Christine
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2013, 99 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [24] Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects
    McCambridge, Jim
    Witton, John
    Elbourne, Diana. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (03) : 267 - 277
  • [25] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Extensible and Inextensible Lumbosacral Orthoses and Standard Care Alone in the Management of Lower Back Pain
    Morrisette, David C.
    Cholewicki, Jacek
    Logan, Sarah
    Seif, Gretchen
    McGowan, Stephanie
    [J]. SPINE, 2014, 39 (21) : 1733 - 1742
  • [26] Prateepavanich Pradit, 2001, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V84, P572
  • [27] Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians
    Qaseem, Amir
    Wilt, Timothy J.
    McLean, Robert M.
    Forciea, Mary Ann
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 166 (07) : 514 - U142
  • [28] Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis-a comparative study
    Rainville, James
    Childs, Lisa A.
    Pena, Enrique B.
    Suri, Pradeep
    Limke, Janet C.
    Jouve, Cristin
    Hunter, David J.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [29] Does This Older Adult With Lower Extremity Pain Have the Clinical Syndrome of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
    Suri, Pradeep
    Rainville, James
    Kalichman, Leonid
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (23): : 2628 - 2636
  • [30] EPIDURAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EPIDURAL PRESSURE AND POSTURE IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    TAKAHASHI, K
    MIYAZAKI, T
    TAKINO, T
    MATSUI, T
    TOMITA, K
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) : 650 - 653