MJO Prediction Skill Using IITM Extended Range Prediction System and Comparison with ECMWF S2S

被引:5
|
作者
Dey, Avijit [1 ,2 ]
Chattopadhyay, R. [1 ,2 ]
Sahai, A. K. [1 ]
Mandal, R. [1 ]
Joseph, S. [1 ]
Phani, R. [1 ]
Pattanaik, D. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Trop Meteorol, Dr Homi Bhabha Rd, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
[2] Savitribai Phule Pune Univ, Dept Atmospher & Space Sci, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] Indian Meteorol Dept, New Delhi, India
关键词
MJO; prediction skill; predictability; extended range; ECMWF; IITM; MADDEN-JULIAN OSCILLATION; INDIAN-SUMMER MONSOON; FORECAST SKILL; PREDICTABILITY; TRACKING; TROPICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00024-020-02487-z
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Eastward propagating Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) is a dominant mode of the intraseasonal variability and hence a potential source of intraseasonal predictability. Therefore, advancing MJO prediction using state-of-the-art dynamical model is of utmost importance for improving intraseasonal prediction. The prediction skill and predictability of MJO are assessed using 44 members ensemble hindcast (16 years data; 2001-2016) of CFSv2 based extended range prediction (ERP) system of IITM as well as 10 member ensemble hindcast (16 years data; 2001-2016) of ECMWF S2S dataset. The MJO is diagnosed using a newly developed Extended Empirical Orthogonal Function (EEOF) analysis. Near equatorial (15 degrees S-15 degrees N) model anomaly fields are projected onto the leading pair of observed eigen modes. The leading pair of observed eigen modes are obtained based on the EEOF analysis of the combined field of zonal wind at 200 hPa (U200), zonal wind at 850 hPa (U850) and velocity potential at 200 hPa (chi200). Model forecasted principal components (PCs) are quantitatively compared with observed PCs using bivariate correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE). We find that MJO could be predicted up to around 22 days (around 31 days) for IITM ERP system (ECMWF S2S dataset) as measured by anomaly correlation coefficient remains larger than 0.5 and RMSE remains lower than 1.4. This prediction skill is quite low compared to potential predictability, which is estimated as more than 40 days both for IITM-ERP and ECMWF system. MJO prediction skill varies with initial MJO phase, particularly at the longer lead. This variation is more significant for the ECMWF system. Model (both for IITM-ERP and ECMWF) predicted amplitude drops at a faster rate and phase propagation speed for almost all initial phase is slower and amplitude is weaker compared to the observation. It could be concluded that even the state-of-the-art models [IITM-ERP (basically NCEP CFSv2) and ECMWF] are also not free from systematic errors/biases. Hence, there is an enormous space for improving MJO prediction skill by reducing these errors/biases in the dynamical model and error in the initial condition.
引用
收藏
页码:5067 / 5079
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Philippine springtime (February-April) sub-seasonal rainfall extremes and extended-range forecast skill assessment using the S2S database
    Lu, Mong-Ming
    Tsai, Wayne Yuan -Huai
    Huang, Sheng-Feng
    Cho, Yin -Min
    Sui, Chung-Hsiung
    Solis, Ana L. S.
    Chen, Meng-Shih
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2023, 41
  • [32] Subseasonal Prediction of Wintertime Northern Hemisphere Extratropical Cyclone Activity by SubX and S2S Models
    Zheng, Cheng
    Chang, Edmund Kar-Man
    Kim, Hyemi
    Zhang, Minghua
    Wang, Wanqiu
    WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2021, 36 (01) : 75 - 89
  • [33] Evaluation and comparison of the subseasonal prediction skill of Indian summer monsoon in IITM CFSv2 and UKMO GloSea5
    Susmitha Joseph
    R. Chattopadhyay
    A. K. Sahai
    Gill M. Martin
    Avijit Dey
    Raju Mandal
    R. Phani
    Climate Dynamics, 2023, 61 : 1683 - 1696
  • [34] Seasonal prediction skill of ECMWF System 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast for the Northern Hemisphere Winter
    Kim, Hye-Mi
    Webster, Peter J.
    Curry, Judith A.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2012, 39 (12) : 2957 - 2973
  • [35] Prediction of near-surface conditions following the 2023/24 sudden stratospheric warming by the S2S project models
    Rao, Jian
    Zhang, Xiaoqi
    Lu, Qian
    Liu, Siming
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2025, 315
  • [36] Sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction of dry and wet extremes for climate adaptation in India
    Malik, Iqura
    Mishra, Vimal
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2024, 34
  • [37] Prediction of the Midlatitude Response to Strong Madden-Julian Oscillation Events on S2S Time Scales
    Tseng, K. -C.
    Barnes, E. A.
    Maloney, E. D.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 45 (01) : 463 - 470
  • [38] An inter-comparison performance assessment of a Brazilian global sub-seasonal prediction model against four sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction project models
    Bruno dos Santos Guimarães
    Caio Augusto dos Santos Coelho
    Steven James Woolnough
    Paulo Yoshio Kubota
    Carlos Frederico Bastarz
    Silvio Nilo Figueroa
    José Paulo Bonatti
    Dayana Castilho de Souza
    Climate Dynamics, 2021, 56 : 2359 - 2375
  • [39] Seasonal prediction skill of ECMWF System 4 and NCEP CFSv2 retrospective forecast for the Northern Hemisphere Winter
    Hye-Mi Kim
    Peter J. Webster
    Judith A. Curry
    Climate Dynamics, 2012, 39 : 2957 - 2973
  • [40] Seasonality in Prediction Skill of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and Associated Dynamics in Version 2 of NASA's GEOS-S2S Forecast System
    Lim, Young-Kwon
    Arnold, Nathan P.
    Molod, Andrea M.
    Pawson, Steven
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2021, 126 (18)