Selection for uniformity in livestock by exploiting genetic heterogeneity of residual variance

被引:69
作者
Mulder, Han A. [1 ]
Bijma, Piter [1 ]
Hill, William G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Biol Sci, Inst Evolut Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
heterogeneity of variance; index selection; uniformity; economic value; optimum trait;
D O I
10.1051/gse:2007034
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In some situations, it is worthwhile to change not only the mean, but also the variability of traits by selection. Genetic variation in residual variance may be utilised to improve uniformity in livestock populations by selection. The objective was to investigate the effects of genetic parameters, breeding goal, number of progeny per sire and breeding scheme on selection responses in mean and variance when applying index selection. Genetic parameters were obtained from the literature. Economic values for the mean and variance were derived for some standard non- linear profit equations, e. g. for traits with an intermediate optimum. The economic value of variance was in most situations negative, indicating that selection for reduced variance increases profit. Predicted responses in residual variance after one generation of selection were large, in some cases when the number of progeny per sire was at least 50, by more than 10% of the current residual variance. Progeny testing schemes were more efficient than sib-testing schemes in decreasing residual variance. With optimum traits, selection pressure shifts gradually from the mean to the variance when approaching the optimum. Genetic improvement of uniformity is particularly interesting for traits where the current population mean is near an intermediate optimum.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 59
页数:23
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits (Sinauer)
[2]   Assessing the value of improved marbling in beef breeding objectives and selection [J].
Barwick, SA ;
Henzell, AL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1999, 50 (04) :503-512
[3]   DERIVATION OF ECONOMIC VALUES FOR VEAL, BEEF AND MILK-PRODUCTION TRAITS USING PROFIT EQUATIONS [J].
BEKMAN, H ;
VANARENDONK, JAM .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (1-2) :35-56
[4]  
Brascamp E. W., 1984, Animal Breeding Abstracts, V52, P645
[5]   HETEROGENEITY OF VARIANCE AMONGST HERDS FOR MILK-PRODUCTION [J].
BROTHERSTONE, S ;
HILL, WG .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1986, 42 :297-303
[6]   EFFECT OF SELECTION ON GENETIC VARIABILITY [J].
BULMER, MG .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1971, 105 (943) :201-+
[7]   SELECTION ON PHENOTYPIC VARIATION OF PUPA WEIGHT IN TRIBOLIUM-CASTANEUM [J].
CARDIN, S ;
MINVIELLE, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1986, 28 (05) :856-861
[8]   HETEROGENEITY OF DAUGHTER VARIANCES OF SIRES FOR MILK-YIELD [J].
CLAY, JS ;
VINSON, WE ;
WHITE, JM .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1979, 62 (06) :985-989
[9]   OPTIMAL BREEDING STRATEGIES FOR CALVING EASE [J].
DEKKERS, JCM .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1994, 77 (11) :3441-3453
[10]   ASYMPTOTIC RESPONSE TO SELECTION ON BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTORS OF BREEDING VALUES [J].
DEKKERS, JCM .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1992, 54 :351-360