Interactions between market reform and a carbon price in China's power sector

被引:32
作者
Teng, Fei [1 ]
Jotzo, Frank [2 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Climate change; emission trading scheme; electricity reform; policy interaction; TRADING SCHEME; DESIGN;
D O I
10.5547/2160-5890.6.1.ften
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The electricity sector accounts for a large share of China's carbon dioxide emissions and of the economy-wide abatement potential. China's planned national emissions trading scheme would include electricity generation, as nearly all emissions trading schemes do. The critical difference is that in most existing carbon pricing systems the power sector operates with competitive markets and cost-based pricing, while the Chinese power industry still uses a highly regulated dispatch and pricing system. Together these limitations mean that the effect of a carbon price on China is limited in terms of the impact on operational decisions for existing power stations and in terms of the effects on investment decisions. We explore the channels of interaction between electricity market reform and carbon pricing in China, and provide quantitative estimates of the effects and interactions on electricity sector emissions. A probabilistic discrete choice model is used to simulate the behavior of investors in the power sector. The analysis indicates that market reform can help reduce emissions intensity, but to meet China's 2030 targets for non fossil fuel generation a low to moderate carbon price is also necessary; conversely, a carbon price will only be effective with market reform that provides flexibility in dispatch. Using our simplified quantitative analysis, the carbon price required for the same share of non-fossil fuel generation would be about twice as high without market reform. Combining market reform and a carbon price could achieve significant rates of decarbonization and is likely to be the most effective and most feasibly policy package to cut emissions from China's power sector.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 54
页数:16
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, MARKET SCI, DOI DOI 10.1287/MKSC.2.3.203
[2]   Marginal CO2 cost pass-through under imperfect competition in power markets [J].
Chernyavs'ka, Liliya ;
Gulli, Francesco .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 68 (1-2) :408-421
[3]   MODELING ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET [J].
CLARKE, JF ;
EDMONDS, JA .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1993, 15 (02) :123-129
[4]   Promoting energy-saving and environmentally friendly generation dispatching model in China: Phase development and case studies [J].
Ding, Yi ;
Yang, Hongliang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 57 :109-118
[5]   Introducing the emissions trading system to China's electricity sector: Challenges and opportunities [J].
Fei Teng ;
Xin Wang ;
Lv Zhiqiang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :39-45
[6]   Evolution of China's power dispatch principle and the new energy saving power dispatch policy [J].
Gao Ciwei ;
Li Yang .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :7346-7357
[7]  
International Energy Agency (IEA), 2016, INT EN OUTL 2016
[8]   Emissions trading in China: Emerging experiences and international lessons [J].
Jotzo, Frank ;
Loeschel, Andreas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :3-8
[9]   The political economy of electricity dispatch reform in China [J].
Kahrl, Fredrich ;
Williams, James H. ;
Hu, Junfeng .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 :361-369
[10]   An emissions trading scheme design for power industries facing price regulation [J].
Kim, Yong-Gun ;
Lim, Jong-Soo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :84-90