Performance Analysis of Sensor Fusion Techniques for Heading Estimation Using Smartphone Sensors

被引:48
作者
Poulose, Alwin [1 ]
Senouci, Benaoumeur [2 ]
Han, Dong Seog [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[2] ECE Paris, INSEEC U Res Ctr, Intelligent & Commun Syst Grp, F-75015 Paris, France
关键词
Estimation; Sensor fusion; Gyroscopes; Kalman filters; Magnetometers; Magnetic sensors; Heading estimation; indoor localization; smartphone sensors; Kalman filter; quaternion; sensor fusion; EXTENDED KALMAN FILTER; PEDESTRIAN NAVIGATION; LOCALIZATION; SYSTEM; ORIENTATION; ATTITUDE; WIFI; AHRS;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2019.2940071
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Efficient indoor positioning requires accurate heading and step length estimation algorithms. Therefore, in order to improve the indoor position accuracy, it is necessary to estimate both the user heading and step length with minimal error. These include errors from the accelerometer, magnetometer and gyroscope of smartphone sensors. Fusing different sensor data has a high impact on improving heading accuracy. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of different sensor fusion techniques for heading estimation using smartphone sensors. The performance of different sensor fusion techniques is discussed in terms of root mean square error and cumulative distribution functions of heading errors. The experimental results show the effects of different sensor fusion techniques for heading estimation. The performance of five sensor fusion techniques such as a linear Kalman filter (LKF), extended Kalman filter (EKF), unscented Kalman filter (UKF), particle filters (PF) and complementary filters (CF) were analyzed. The UKF fusion algorithm shows better results compared to EKF and LKF fusion algorithms. The EKF approach is better than LKF and CF approaches. The experimental results show that the PF fusion technique has poor performance for heading estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:12369 / 12380
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Abadi MJ, 2014, INT C INDOOR POSIT, P554, DOI 10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275528
[2]  
Aitenbichler E, 2003, 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS, P334
[3]   Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning Technologies: Analysis and Recent Advances [J].
Alarifi, Abdulrahman ;
Al-Salman, AbdulMalik ;
Alsaleh, Mansour ;
Alnafessah, Ahmad ;
Al-Hadhrami, Suheer ;
Al-Ammar, Mai A. ;
Al-Khalifa, Hend S. .
SENSORS, 2016, 16 (05)
[4]   Pose Estimation of a Mobile Robot Based on Fusion of IMU Data and Vision Data Using an Extended Kalman Filter [J].
Alatise, Mary B. ;
Hancke, Gerhard P. .
SENSORS, 2017, 17 (10)
[5]  
Angermann M., 2012, INDOOR POSITIONING I, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1109/IPIN.2012.6418864, 10.1109/IPIN.2012.6418864]
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[7]  
[Anonymous], INT J NAVIGAT OBSERV
[8]  
[Anonymous], ROBOT LOCALIZATION M
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, IEEE ASME T MECHATRO
[10]  
[Anonymous], P S KOR I COMM INF S