Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions

被引:55
作者
Heidari, Bardia [1 ]
Marr, Linsey C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
FUEL USE; DIESEL; ENGINE; VEHICLES; BIODIESEL;
D O I
10.1080/10962247.2014.978485
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The construction industry is a large source of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. Measuring and monitoring real-time emissions will provide practitioners with information to assess environmental impacts and improve the sustainability of construction. We employed a portable emission measurement system (PEMS) for real-time measurement of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbon, and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from construction equipment to derive emission rates (mass of pollutant emitted per unit time) and emission factors (mass of pollutant emitted per unit volume of fuel consumed) under real-world operating conditions. Measurements were compared with emissions predicted by methodologies used in three models: NONROAD2008, OFFROAD2011, and a modal statistical model. Measured emission rates agreed with model predictions for some pieces of equipment but were up to 100 times lower for others. Much of the difference was driven by lower fuel consumption rates than predicted. Emission factors during idling and hauling were significantly different from each other and from those of other moving activities, such as digging and dumping. It appears that operating conditions introduce considerable variability in emission factors. Results of this research will aid researchers and practitioners in improving current emission estimation techniques, frameworks, and databases. Implications: Construction equipment is an important source of air pollutant emissions. There are large uncertainties in estimates of emissions from construction equipment, partly due to the small number of published measurements. The authors have expanded the database by measuring emissions of CO2, NOx, hydrocarbons, and CO from construction equipment under actual operating conditions on-site. There were large discrepancies between measured emissions and those predicted by models, including NONROAD and OFFROAD. Emission factors associated with idling and hauling were significantly different from each other and from those of other activities. These results can be used to improve the next generation of emission estimation models.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 125
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Idle emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicles: Review and recent data [J].
Khan, A. B. M. S. ;
Clark, Nigel N. ;
Thompson, Gregory J. ;
Wayne, W. Scott ;
Gautam, Mridul ;
Lyons, Donald W. ;
Hawelti, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2006, 56 (10) :1404-1419
[22]  
Koupal J., P 12 CRC ON ROAD VEH
[23]  
LEWIS MP, 2009, THESIS N CAROLINA ST
[24]   Effects of Engine Idling on National Ambient Air Quality Standards Criteria Pollutant Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment [J].
Lewis, Phil ;
Rasdorf, William ;
Frey, H. Christopher ;
Leming, Michael .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2270) :67-75
[25]   Impact of Engine Idling on Fuel Use and CO2 Emissions of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment [J].
Lewis, Phil ;
Leming, Michael ;
Rasdorf, William .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2012, 28 (01) :31-38
[26]   Development and Use of Emissions Inventories for Construction Vehicles [J].
Lewis, Phil ;
Frey, H. Christopher ;
Rasdorf, William .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2123) :46-53
[27]   Requirements and Incentives for Reducing Construction Vehicle Emissions and Comparison of Nonroad Diesel Engine Emissions Data Sources [J].
Lewis, Phil ;
Rasdorf, William ;
Frey, H. Christopher ;
Pang, Shih-Hao ;
Kim, Kangwook .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2009, 135 (05) :341-351
[28]  
Li H., 2010, 2010 I EL EL ENG IEE
[29]  
LINDHJEM CE, 1998, MEDIAN LIFE ANN ACTI
[30]  
May D.F., 2003, ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS