Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions

被引:55
作者
Heidari, Bardia [1 ]
Marr, Linsey C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
FUEL USE; DIESEL; ENGINE; VEHICLES; BIODIESEL;
D O I
10.1080/10962247.2014.978485
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The construction industry is a large source of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants. Measuring and monitoring real-time emissions will provide practitioners with information to assess environmental impacts and improve the sustainability of construction. We employed a portable emission measurement system (PEMS) for real-time measurement of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbon, and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from construction equipment to derive emission rates (mass of pollutant emitted per unit time) and emission factors (mass of pollutant emitted per unit volume of fuel consumed) under real-world operating conditions. Measurements were compared with emissions predicted by methodologies used in three models: NONROAD2008, OFFROAD2011, and a modal statistical model. Measured emission rates agreed with model predictions for some pieces of equipment but were up to 100 times lower for others. Much of the difference was driven by lower fuel consumption rates than predicted. Emission factors during idling and hauling were significantly different from each other and from those of other moving activities, such as digging and dumping. It appears that operating conditions introduce considerable variability in emission factors. Results of this research will aid researchers and practitioners in improving current emission estimation techniques, frameworks, and databases. Implications: Construction equipment is an important source of air pollutant emissions. There are large uncertainties in estimates of emissions from construction equipment, partly due to the small number of published measurements. The authors have expanded the database by measuring emissions of CO2, NOx, hydrocarbons, and CO from construction equipment under actual operating conditions on-site. There were large discrepancies between measured emissions and those predicted by models, including NONROAD and OFFROAD. Emission factors associated with idling and hauling were significantly different from each other and from those of other activities. These results can be used to improve the next generation of emission estimation models.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 125
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Real-world in-use activity, fuel use, and emissions for nonroad construction vehicles: A case study for excavators [J].
Abolhasani, Saeed ;
Frey, H. Christopher ;
Kim, Kangwook ;
Rasdorf, William ;
Lewis, Phil ;
Pang, Shih-Hao .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2008, 58 (08) :1033-1046
[2]   Engine and Duty Cycle Variability in Diesel Construction Equipment Emissions [J].
Abolhasani, Saeed ;
Frey, H. Christopher .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (02) :261-268
[3]   Importance of Operational Efficiency to Achieve Energy Efficiency and Exhaust Emission Reduction of Construction Operations [J].
Ahn, Changbum R. ;
Lee, SangHyun .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (04) :404-413
[4]   Online Emissions from a Vibrating Roller Using an Ethanol-Diesel Blend during a Railway Construction [J].
Armas, O. ;
Lapuerta, M. ;
Mata, C. ;
Perez, D. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (5-6) :2989-2996
[5]   The effects of altitude on heavy-duty diesel truck on-road emissions [J].
Bishop, GA ;
Morris, JA ;
Stedman, DH ;
Cohen, LH ;
Countess, RJ ;
Countess, SJ ;
Maly, P ;
Scherer, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (08) :1574-1578
[6]  
California Air Reources Board, 2010, APP D MOB SOURC EM I
[7]  
California Air Reources Board, 2007, OFF ROAD DIES EQ INV
[8]   Factors affecting heavy-duty diesel vehicle emissions [J].
Clark, NN ;
Kern, JM ;
Atkinson, CM ;
Nine, RD .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2002, 52 (01) :84-94
[9]   Evaluation and comparison of portable emissions measurement systems and federal reference methods for emissions from a back-up generator and a diesel truck operated on a chassis dynamometer [J].
Durbin, Thomas D. ;
Johnson, Kent ;
Cocker, David R., III ;
Miller, J. Wayne ;
Maldonado, Hector ;
Shah, Atul ;
Ensfield, Carl ;
Weaver, Chris ;
Akard, Mike ;
Harvey, Neal ;
Symon, James ;
Lanni, Thomas ;
Bachalo, William D. ;
Payne, Greg ;
Smallwood, Greg ;
Linke, Manfred .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (17) :6199-6204
[10]   Comparison of Real-World Emissions of B20 Biodiesel Versus Petroleum Diesel for Selected Nonroad Vehicles and Engine Tiers [J].
Frey, H. Christopher ;
Rasdorf, William ;
Kim, Kangwook ;
Pang, Ghih-hao ;
Lewis, Phil .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2008, (2058) :33-42