Adopting performance appraisal and reward systems A qualitative analysis of public sector organisational change

被引:26
作者
Azzone, Giovanni [1 ]
Palermo, Tommaso [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Organizational change; Public sector organizations; Italy; Central government; Performance appraisal; Change management; MANAGEMENT; PAY; RATIONALITY; CULTURE; BACK;
D O I
10.1108/09534811111102300
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a qualitative analysis of change, in order to understand which factors inhibit or, conversely, facilitate the enactment process of managers' performance appraisal and reward systems. Design/methodology/approach - The problem is investigated empirically through a multiple case study approach. The change processes that result from the adoption of performance appraisal and reward systems in six Italian central government institutions are illustrated in detail. Findings - The cases reveal differentiated patterns of organizational change and lead to a problematic overview. The desired technical and cultural organisational transformations are limited by an interplay of organisational and wider environment forces. Research limitations/implications - The findings are based on data from the Italian central government, and as such are not directly extendable elsewhere, although they may result to be of interest to other public sector organisations. Originality/value - The paper offers a comprehensive view of organisational change processes, ranging from the initial decision to adopt a managerial instrument to the final use of this instrument. A theoretical framework combining two, apparently diverging approaches, neoinstitutionalism and organisational change management, is used to better understand the plural factors that influence the change processes.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 111
页数:22
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change [J].
Buchanan, D ;
Fitzgerald, L ;
Ketley, D ;
Gollop, R ;
Jones, JL ;
Lamont, SS ;
Neath, A ;
Whitby, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2005, 7 (03) :189-205
[12]  
Campbell DJ, 1998, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V37, P131, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199822)37:2<131::AID-HRM4>3.0.CO
[13]  
2-X
[14]  
Coram R., 2001, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V14, P94, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513550110387381, https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550110387381]
[15]  
Daft R.L., 1997, MANAGEMENT, V5th
[16]  
DELLAROCCA G, 2000, SCAND J MANAG, V26, P375
[17]   The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983) [J].
DiMaggio, PJ ;
Powell, WW .
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 :143-166
[18]   Contextual determinants of reward systems' success: An exploratory study [J].
Fay, CH ;
Thompson, MA .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 40 (03) :213-226
[19]   Managing successful organizational change in the public sector [J].
Fernandez, S ;
Rainey, HG .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (02) :168-176
[20]   Political versus managerial use of cost and performance accounting [J].
Flury, Reto ;
Schedler, Kuno .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (04) :229-234