Use of a Robotic Device for the Rehabilitation of Severe Upper Limb Paresis in Subacute Stroke: Exploration of Patient/Robot Interactions and the Motor Recovery Process

被引:26
作者
Duret, Christophe [1 ]
Courtial, Ophelie [1 ]
Grosmaire, Anne-Gaelle [1 ]
Hutin, Emilie [2 ]
机构
[1] CRF Les Trois Soleils, Med Phys & Readaptat, Unite Reeduc Neurol, F-77310 Boissise Le Roi, France
[2] Grp Hosp Henri Mondor, AP HP, Reeduc Neurolocomotrice, Anal & Restaurat Mouvement, F-94010 Creteil, France
关键词
ASSISTED THERAPY; ARM MOVEMENTS; IMPAIRMENT; IMPROVES; NEUROREHABILITATION; INTENSITY; MODEL; TIME; LEG;
D O I
10.1155/2015/482389
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This pioneering observational study explored the interaction between subacute stroke inpatients and a rehabilitation robot during upper limb training. 25 stroke survivors (age 55 +/- 17 years; time since stroke, 52 +/- 21 days) with severe upper limb paresis carried out 16 sessions of robot-assisted shoulder/elbow training (InMotion 2.0, IMT, Inc., MA, USA) combined with standard therapy. The values of 3 patient/robot interaction parameters (a guidance parameter: Stiffness, a velocity-related parameter: Slottime, and Robotic Power) were compared between sessions 1 (S1), 4 (S4), 8 (S8), 12 (S12), and 16 (S16). Pre/post Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores were compared in 18 patients. Correlations between interaction parameters and clinical and kinematic outcome measures were evaluated. Slottime decreased at S8 (P = 0.003), while Guidance decreased at S12 (P = 0.008). Robotic Power tended to decrease until S16. FMA scores improved from S1 to S16 (+49%, P = 0.002). Changes in FMA score were correlated with the Stiffness parameter (R = 0.4, P = 0.003). Slottime was correlated with movement velocity. This novel approach demonstrated that a robotic device is a useful and reliable tool for the quantification of interaction parameters. Moreover, changes in these parameters were correlated with clinical and kinematic changes. These results suggested that robot-based recordings can provide new insights into the motor recovery process.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke [J].
Aisen, ML ;
Krebs, HI ;
Hogan, N ;
McDowell, F ;
Volpe, BT .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 54 (04) :443-446
[2]   REPETITIVE TRAINING OF ISOLATED MOVEMENTS IMPROVES THE OUTCOME OF MOTOR REHABILITATION OF THE CENTRALLY PARETIC HAND [J].
BUTEFISCH, C ;
HUMMELSHEIM, H ;
DENZLER, P ;
MAURITZ, KH .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 130 (01) :59-68
[3]  
Collantes I, 2012, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P4855, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347081
[4]   Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb [J].
Colombo, R. ;
Pisano, F. ;
Micera, S. ;
Mazzone, A. ;
Delconte, C. ;
Carrozza, M. C. ;
Dario, P. ;
Minuco, G. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2008, 22 (01) :50-63
[5]   The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cooke, Emma V. ;
Mares, Kathryn ;
Clark, Allan ;
Tallis, Raymond C. ;
Pomeroy, Valerie M. .
BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8
[6]   Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap [J].
Desrosiers, J ;
Malouin, F ;
Bourbonnais, D ;
Richards, CL ;
Rochette, A ;
Bravo, G .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 17 (06) :666-673
[7]   Rehabilitation after stroke [J].
Dobkin, BH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (16) :1677-1684
[8]   Effects of prolonged robot-assisted training on upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke [J].
Duret, Christophe ;
Hutin, Emilie .
NEUROREHABILITATION, 2013, 33 (01) :41-48
[9]   Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results [J].
Fasoli, SE ;
Krebs, HI ;
Stein, J ;
Frontera, WR ;
Hughes, R ;
Hogan, N .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (07) :1106-1111
[10]   Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: A 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial [J].
Feys, H ;
De Weerdt, W ;
Verbeke, G ;
Steck, GC ;
Capiau, C ;
Kiekens, C ;
Dejaeger, E ;
Van Hoydonck, G ;
Vermeersch, G ;
Cras, P .
STROKE, 2004, 35 (04) :924-929