EFFECTS OF APPROXIMATE DECONVOLUTION MODELS ON THE SOLUTION OF THE STOCHASTIC NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS

被引:6
作者
Gunzburger, M. [1 ]
Labovsky, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Turbulence modeling; Stochastic Navier-Stokes equations; Deconvolution;
D O I
10.4208/jcm.1006-m3244
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The direct numerical simulation of Navier-Stokes equations in the turbulent regime is not computationally feasible either in the deterministic or (especially) in the stochastic case. Therefore, turbulent modeling must be employed. We consider the family of approximate deconvolution models (ADM) for the simulation of the turbulent stochastic Navier-Stokes equations (NSE). For moderate values of the Reynolds number, we investigate the effect stochastic forcing (through the boundary conditions) has on the accuracy of solutions of the ADM equations compared to direct numerical simulations. Although the existence, uniqueness and verifiability of the ADM solutions has already been proven in the deterministic setting, the analyticity of a solution of the stochastic NSE is difficult to prove. Hence, we approach the problem from the computational point of view. A Smolyak-type sparse grid stochastic collocation method is employed for the approximation of first two statistical moments of the solution the expected value and variance. We show that for different test problems, the modeling error in the stochastic case is the same as predicted for the deterministic setting. Although the ADMs are arguably only applicable for certain boundary conditions (zero or periodic), we test the model on a problem with a boundary layer and recirculation region and demonstrate that the model correctly predicts the solution of the stochastic NSE with the noise in the boundary data.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 140
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Adams NA, 2001, MODERN SIMULATION STRATEGIES FOR TURBULENT FLOW, P21
[2]   Solving elliptic boundary value problems with uncertain coefficients by the finite element method: the stochastic formulation [J].
Babuska, I ;
Tempone, R ;
Zouraris, GE .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2005, 194 (12-16) :1251-1294
[3]   On solving elliptic stochastic partial differential equations [J].
Babuska, I ;
Chatzipantelidis, P .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2002, 191 (37-38) :4093-4122
[4]   Galerkin finite element approximations of stochastic elliptic partial differential equations [J].
Babuska, I ;
Tempone, R ;
Zouraris, GE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 42 (02) :800-825
[5]   A stochastic collocation method for elliptic partial differential equations with random input data [J].
Babuska, Ivo ;
Nobile, Fabio ;
Tempone, Raul .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2007, 45 (03) :1005-1034
[6]   High dimensional polynomial interpolation on sparse grids [J].
Barthelmann, V ;
Novak, E ;
Ritter, K .
ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS, 2000, 12 (04) :273-288
[7]   On the Stolz-Adams deconvolution model for the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows [J].
Dunca, A ;
Epshteyn, Y .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 37 (06) :1890-1902
[8]   <bold>Statistical Model Order Reduction for Interconnect Circuits Considering Spatial Correlations</bold> [J].
Fan, Jeffrey ;
Mi, Ning ;
Tan, Sheldon X. -D. ;
Cai, Yici ;
Hong, Xianlong .
2007 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION, VOLS 1-3, 2007, :1508-+
[9]   Nonlocal and localized analyses of conditional mean steady state flow in bounded, randomly nonuniform domains 1. Theory and computational approach [J].
Guadagnini, A ;
Neuman, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (10) :2999-3018
[10]  
LABOVSCHII A, 2008, FAMILY APPROXIMATE D