Survival outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy versus extended pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure for pancreatic head carcinoma: a propensity score matching study

被引:2
|
作者
Pu, Ning [1 ]
Mu, Sucheng [2 ]
Fang, Yuan [1 ]
Yin, Hanlin [1 ]
Liu, Gao [3 ]
Zhao, Guochao [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Wu, Wenchuan [1 ]
Lou, Wenhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Liver Surg & Transplantat, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pancreatic head carcinoma (PHC); pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD); extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (extended PD); propensity score matching (PSM); VASCULAR RESECTION; CANCER; LYMPHADENECTOMY; ADENOCARCINOMA; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTION; STANDARD; RATIO;
D O I
10.21037/tcr.2020.01.38
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: It is unclear if the modified extended pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has better outcome superior the conventional PD for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma (PHC). The objective of this study is to compare the survival outcomes of the classic PD procedure and the modified extended PD procedure for PHC. Methods: A total of 7,084 resected PHC patients with PD and extended PD procedure from the SEER database from 2004 to 2014 were stratified. With the utilization of propensity score matching (PSM), patient baseline characteristics were balanced to decrease the bias. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed in both groups. Results: Of the 7,084 patients, 6,541 (92.3%) and 543 (7.7%) patients received PD and extended PD surgical procedures, respectively. After 2:1 ratio of PSM, 543 patients with extended PD procedure and 1,084 patients with PD procedure were completely matched. The median CSS and OS for PD and extended PD group were 20.0 and 19.0 months, and 19.0 and 18.0 months, respectively. The 5-year CSS and OS rates for PD and extended PD group were 17.5% and 16.1%, and 13.9% and 13.1%, respectively. Conclusions: There is no distinct difference in survival outcomes between PD and extended PD procedure in patients with PHC.
引用
收藏
页码:1476 / 1486
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study
    Shuai Xu
    Xiu-Ping Zhang
    Guo-Dong Zhao
    Wen-Bo Zou
    Zhi-Ming Zhao
    Ming-Gen Hu
    Yuan-Xing Gao
    Xiang-Long Tan
    Qu Liu
    Rong Liu
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 8237 - 8248
  • [32] Comparisons of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using barbed and conventional sutures for pancreaticojejunostomy: a propensity score matching study
    Liu, Wenjing
    Chen, Haomin
    Ren, Bo
    Li, Pengyu
    Chen, Lixin
    Xu, Qiang
    Han, Xianlin
    Liu, Qiaofei
    Chen, Weijie
    Dai, Menghua
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (10): : 5858 - 5868
  • [33] Impact of resection margins on long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma
    Cheng-Gang Li
    Zhi-Peng Zhou
    Xiang-Long Tan
    Yuan-Xing Gao
    Zi-Zheng Wang
    Qu Liu
    Zhi-Ming Zhao
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2019, (24) : 4186 - 4195
  • [34] Propensity score-matching analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients
    Heeji Shin
    Ki Byung Song
    Young Il Kim
    Young-Joo Lee
    Dae Wook Hwang
    Jae Hoon Lee
    Sang Hyun Shin
    Jaewoo Kwon
    Shadi Alshammary
    Guisuk Park
    Yejong Park
    Seung Jae Lee
    Song Cheol Kim
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [35] Which one is better? Laparoscopic versus robotic reconstruction in the remnant soft pancreas with a small pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter study with propensity score matching analysis
    Jang, Jae Young
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Kim, Hyeyeon
    Choi, Munseok
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Choi, Sung Hoon
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (05): : 4028 - 4039
  • [36] Risk factors for complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP analysis with propensity score matching
    Vining, Charles C.
    Kuchta, Kristine
    Schuitevoerder, Darryl
    Paterakos, Pierce
    Berger, Yaniv
    Roggin, Kevin K.
    Talamonti, Mark S.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 122 (02) : 183 - 194
  • [37] Which one is better? Laparoscopic versus robotic reconstruction in the remnant soft pancreas with a small pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter study with propensity score matching analysis
    Jae Young Jang
    Chang Moo Kang
    Hyeyeon Kim
    Munseok Choi
    Jae Hoon Lee
    Sung Hoon Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 4028 - 4039
  • [38] Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis
    Zhu, Yuwen
    Zu, Guangchen
    Wu, Di
    Zhang, Yue
    Yang, Yang
    Wu, Han
    Chen, Xuemin
    Chen, Weibo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [39] Propensity score-matching analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients
    Shin, Heeji
    Song, Ki Byung
    Kim, Young Il
    Lee, Young-Joo
    Hwang, Dae Wook
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Shin, Sang Hyun
    Kwon, Jaewoo
    Alshammary, Shadi
    Park, Guisuk
    Park, Yejong
    Lee, Seung Jae
    Kim, Song Cheol
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [40] Predictors and outcomes of converted minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matched analysis
    Hester, Caitlin A.
    Nassour, Ibrahim
    Christie, Alana
    Augustine, Mathew M.
    Mansour, John C.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Shoultz, Thomas H.
    Wang, Sam C.
    Yopp, Adam C.
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Minter, Rebecca M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 544 - 550