Combining cognitive bias modification training with motivational support in alcohol dependent outpatients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

被引:26
作者
Boffo, Marilisa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pronk, Thomas [2 ]
Wiers, Reinout W. [2 ]
Mannarini, Stefania [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Philosophy Sociol Educ & Appl Psychol FISPPA, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol Addict Dev & Psychopathol, ADAPT Lab, NL-1018 XA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Antwerp, Collaborat Antwerp Psychiat Res Inst, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Univ Padua, Interdept Ctr Family Res, FISPPA, I-35139 Padua, Italy
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cognitive Bias Modification; Motivational support; Alcohol; Addiction; Approach bias; Attentional bias; Randomised clinical trial; AUTOMATIC ACTION-TENDENCIES; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; DECISION-MAKING; HEAVY DRINKERS; ADDICTION; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; DEFICITS; IMPULSE;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-015-0576-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Addiction research has hypothesised that automatic and reflective cognitive processes play an important role in the onset and maintenance of alcohol (ab) use, wherein automatic reactions to drug-related cues steer the drug user towards consuming before reflective processes can get over and steer towards a different behavioural response. These automatic processes include the tendency to attend and approach alcohol cues. These biases may be trained away from alcohol via computerised cognitive bias modification (CBM). The present protocol describes the design of a double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness of attentional bias and approach bias re-training with a 2x2 factorial design, alongside a brief motivational support (MS) program. Methods/Design: Participants (n = 120) are adult alcohol dependent outpatients, recruited from a public health service for addiction in Italy, who have been abstinent for at least two months, and with a main diagnosis of alcohol dependence disorder. Participants are randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions and complete 11 sessions of training after a baseline assessment. The MS takes place before each training session. Post-intervention and three-month follow-up assessments examine the change in clinical outcome variables and attentional and approach biases (measured with the Visual Probe Task and the Approach-Avoidance Task, respectively). Alcohol approach-avoidance implicit memory associations (measured with the Brief Implicit Association Test) are also evaluated at pre-and post-intervention to explore generalisation effects. Primary outcome measure is relapse rate at follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include change in cognitive biases, in alcohol-related implicit memory associations, and in the clinical variables assessed. An exploratory analysis is also planned to detect interaction effects between the CBM modules and possible moderators (interference control capacity, gender, age, number of previous detoxifications) and mediators (change in cognitive bias) of the primary outcome measure. Discussion: This RCT is the first to test the effectiveness of a combined CBM intervention alongside motivational support in alcohol-dependent outpatients. The results of this study can be extremely valuable for future research in the optimisation of CBM treatment for alcohol addiction.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FRONT COGN PSYCHOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ENH MOT CHANG SUBST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, State-Trait Anxiety inventory: Bibiography
[4]  
Anton RF, 2000, ADDICTION, V95, pS211
[5]  
Babor T.F., 2001, Primary Care, V2nd
[6]   Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective [J].
Bechara, A .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (11) :1458-1463
[7]   Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions [J].
Bechara, A ;
Martin, EM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :152-162
[8]  
Beck AT., 1996, PsycTESTS, DOI [DOI 10.1037/T00742-000, 10.1037/t00742-000, DOI .10.1186/1471-2288-14-49]
[9]   Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: meta-analysis [J].
Cristea, Ioana A. ;
Kok, Robin N. ;
Cuijpers, Pim .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 206 (01) :7-16
[10]   Attitudes and evaluations: a social cognitive neuroscience perspective [J].
Cunningham, William A. ;
Zelazo, Philip David .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (03) :97-104