Selected results of a model validation exercise

被引:14
作者
Piringer, M. [1 ]
Baumann-Stanzer, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Inst Meteorol & Geodynam, Vienna, Austria
关键词
DISPERSION MODEL; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.5194/asr-3-13-2009
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The concentration fields calculated with three Gaussian models and one Lagrangian dispersion model are validated against a set of SF6 concentration data provided by the German environmental programme BWPLUS. The source was a pig fattening unit in fairly flat terrain. The results reveal that, in flat terrain with steady undisturbed flow, the use of Gauss models is still justified, whereas Lagrangian models should be used whenever the flow is modified by obstacles or topography.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 16
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, JANICKE CONSULTING L
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, M9440 ONORM
[3]  
[Anonymous], P INT WORKSH QUAL AS
[4]  
Bachlin W, 2002, Project BWE 20003
[5]  
Baumann-Stanzer K., 2008, CROATIAN METEOROLOGI, V43, P52
[6]  
CERC (Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants), 2001, ADMS 3 VERS 3 1 US G
[7]   Air quality model performance evaluation [J].
Chang, JC ;
Hanna, SR .
METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2004, 87 (1-3) :167-196
[8]  
Hanna S. R., 2003, QNET CFD NETWORK NEW, V2, P1
[9]  
Hirtl M., 2007, P 11 INT C HARM 2 5, P21
[10]   Evaluation of two dispersion models (ADMS-Roads and LASAT) applied to street canyons in Stockholm, London and Berlin [J].
Hirtl, Marcus ;
Baumann-Stanzer, Kathrin .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (28) :5959-5971