Equivalence of paper and pencil vs Internet forms of the ZKPQ-50-CC in Spanish and French samples

被引:20
作者
Aluja, Anton
Rossier, Jerome
Zuckerman, Marvin
机构
[1] Univ Lleida, Fac Sch Educ, Dept Pedag & Psychol, E-25192 Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Univ Lausanne, Inst Psychol Quartier UNIL Dorigny, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Delaware, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
关键词
ZKPQ-50-CC; Internet and paper-and-pencil personality questionnaires; personality structure; EFA; CFA;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study was designed to check for the equivalence of the ZKPQ-50-CC (Spanish and French versions) through Internet on-line (OL) and paper and pencil (PP) answer format. Differences in means and deviations were significant in some scales, but effect sizes are minimal except for Sociability in the Spanish sample. Alpha reliabilities are also very similar in both versions with no significant differences between formats. A robust factorial structure was found for the two formats and the average congruency coefficients were 0.98. The goodness-of-fit indexes obtained by confirmatory factorial analysis are very similar to those obtained in the ZKPQ-50-CC validation study and they do not differ between the two formats. The multi-group analysis confirms the equivalence among the OL-PP formats in both countries. These results in general support the validity and reliability of the Internet as a method in investigations using the ZKPQ-50-CC. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2022 / 2032
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling [J].
MacCallum, RC ;
Browne, MW ;
Sugawara, HM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 1 (02) :130-149
[22]   Are Internet and paper-and-pencil personality tests truly comparable? An experimental design measurement invariance study [J].
Meade, Adam W. ;
Michels, Lawrence C. ;
Lautenschlager, Gary J. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 10 (02) :322-345
[23]   Internet-based personality testing: Equivalence of measures and assesses' perceptions and reactions [J].
Salgado, JF ;
Moscoso, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 11 (2-3) :194-205
[24]  
van de Vijver F.J. R., 1997, METHODS DATA ANAL CR
[25]   Informant reports: A cheap, fast, and easy method for personality assessment [J].
Vazire, Simine .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2006, 40 (05) :472-481
[26]  
Yang B, 2004, PSYCHOL REP, V95, P1014
[27]   A COMPARISON OF 3 STRUCTURAL MODELS FOR PERSONALITY - THE BIG 3, THE BIG 5, AND THE ALTERNATIVE 5 [J].
ZUCKERMAN, M ;
KUHLMAN, DM ;
JOIREMAN, J ;
TETA, P ;
KRAFT, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (04) :757-768
[28]   WHAT LIES BEYOND E AND N - FACTOR-ANALYSES OF SCALES BELIEVED TO MEASURE BASIC DIMENSIONS OF PERSONALITY [J].
ZUCKERMAN, M ;
KUHLMAN, DM ;
CAMAC, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 54 (01) :96-107
[29]  
Zuckerman M, 2002, BIG FIVE ASSESSMENT, P377
[30]   5 (OR 3) ROBUST QUESTIONNAIRE SCALE FACTORS OF PERSONALITY WITHOUT CULTURE [J].
ZUCKERMAN, M ;
KUHLMAN, DM ;
THORNQUIST, M ;
KIERS, H .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1991, 12 (09) :929-941