Allostatic load and stress biomarkers in a sample of community-dwelling older adults

被引:11
作者
Falcao Freire, Aline do Nascimento [1 ]
de Souza Barbosa, Juliana Fernandes [1 ]
Pereira, Daniele Sirineu [2 ]
Gomes, Cristiano dos Santos [1 ]
Guerra, Ricardo Oliveira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Dept Physiotherapy, Av Senador Salgado Filho 3000,Campus Univ, BR-59078970 Natal, RN, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Phys Therapy, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Allostasis; Aging; Allostatic load; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; SOCIAL-ENVIRONMENT; BIOLOGICAL RISK; WOMENS HEALTH; LIFE-COURSE; SEX; POPULATION; MACARTHUR; DYSREGULATION; DIFFERENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.archger.2019.104006
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: The idea that cumulative levels of stress can have deleterious effects on health and longevity has led investigators to discuss individual differences in the accumulation of Allostatic Load (AL) during life. Our aim was to evaluate the AL indices and stress biomarkers between genders and to determine which factors were more associated with AL indices. Methods: We evaluated 256 subjects, including 88 men and 168 women, aged 65 years or more. AL was measured by 10 biomarkers, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, waist-hip ratio, glycosylated hemoglobin, salivary cortisol, salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine, total cholesterol and total cholesterol/HDL. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, cognitive function and physical functional variables were additionally analyzed. Results: The mean age of the participants was 74.1 +/- 6.7 years. The AL index was 2.30 +/- 1.68, without a significant difference between gender. The final linear regression model controlling for gender, age, years of study and living arrangement showed that AL was associated to a number of chronic conditions (beta = 0.24; 95 % CI: 0.08-0.40), mobility disability (beta = 0.58; 95 % CI: 0.06-1.14), and handgrip strength (beta = 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.06-1.14). Conclusion: As a result of this investigation, Allostatic load was shown to be associated with poor health or physical function for community-dwelling older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   Lifecourse Adversity and Telomere Length in Older Women from Northeast Brazil [J].
Oliveira, Bruna Silva ;
Zunzunegui, Maria Victoria ;
Quinlan, Jacklyn ;
Batistuzzo de Medeiros, Silvia Regina ;
Thomasini, Ronaldo Luis ;
Guerra, Ricardo Oliveira .
REJUVENATION RESEARCH, 2018, 21 (04) :294-303
[22]  
Pinheiro Rejane Sobrino, 2002, Ciênc. saúde coletiva, V7, P687
[23]   Allostatic Load and Health in the Older Population of England: A Crossed-Lagged Analysis [J].
Read, Sanna ;
Grundy, Emily .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2014, 76 (07) :490-496
[24]   The importance of age, sex and place in understanding socioeconomic inequalities in allostatic load: Evidence from the Scottish Health Survey (2008-2011) [J].
Robertson, Tony ;
Watts, Eleanor .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
[25]  
Seeman TE, 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2259
[26]   Social relationships, gender, and allostatic load across two age cohorts [J].
Seeman, TE ;
Singer, BH ;
Ryff, CD ;
Love, GD ;
Levy-Storms, L .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2002, 64 (03) :395-406
[27]   Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging [J].
Seeman, TE ;
McEwen, BS ;
Rowe, JW ;
Singer, BH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (08) :4770-4775
[28]   Impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation [J].
Seeman, TE ;
McEwen, BS .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1996, 58 (05) :459-471
[29]   Socio-economic differentials in peripheral biology: Cumulative allostatic load [J].
Seeman, Teresa ;
Epel, Elissa ;
Gruenewald, Tara ;
Karlamangla, Arun ;
McEwen, Bruce S. .
BIOLOGY OF DISADVANTAGE: SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH, 2010, 1186 :223-239
[30]   Sex differences in stress responses: Social rejection versus achievement stress [J].
Stroud, LR ;
Salovey, P ;
Epel, ES .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 52 (04) :318-327