Public Reason, Public Comments, and Public Charge: A Case Study in Moral & Practical Reasoning in Federal Rulemaking

被引:2
作者
Fabi, Rachel [1 ]
Zahn, Lauren [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Bioeth & Humanities, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[2] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
Public Charge; Deservingness; Self-Sufficiency; Citizenship; Rulemaking;
D O I
10.1017/jme.2022.59
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The "public charge" rule is a long-standing immigration policy that seeks to determine the likelihood that a prospective immigrant will become dependent on the government for subsistence. When the Trump administration sought to expand the criteria that would count against an applicant for permanent residency to include public benefits historically excluded from the calculation, thousands of commenters wrote to oppose or support the proposed changes. This paper explores the moral and practical reasons commenters provided for their position on the public charge rule and considers the value of the public comment process for immigration, health, and social policy.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 335
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ASS NATL ADVERTISERS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, news release
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Federal Register, V64, P28689
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CITY CTY SAN FRANCIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Cook Cnty. v. Wolf
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1882, Immigration Act of 1882
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NVIVO 12
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, FED REGISTER, V84, P41
[9]  
Charmaz K., 1995, QUALITATIVE RES METH
[10]  
Farina Cynthia R., 2012, Wake Forest Law Review, V47, P101