Non-invasive prenatal testing

被引:5
作者
Harraway, James
机构
关键词
CELL-FREE DNA; FREE FETAL DNA; POSITION STATEMENT; MATERNAL PLASMA; TEST FAILURES; ANEUPLOIDY; DIAGNOSIS; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; TRISOMIES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), also known as cell-free DNA testing and non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), is an important addition to the range of screening tests for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. For trisomy 21 in particular, NIPT is superior to other screening modalities. However, NIPT has limitations and complexities that requesting clinicians and their patients should understand. Objective This review article will briefly describe the technical basis of NIPT assays and compare the performance characteristics of NIPT with existing screening tests. The clinical use of NIPT will also be discussed. Discussion NIPT is now an established option for antenatal screening for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and other selected chromosomal abnormalities. If used appropriately, it increases the detection rate for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, while decreasing the number of invasive tests required. An understanding of the scientific basis of NIPT, and the appropriate clinical use and limitations, will enable medical practitioners to provide optimal antenatal screening.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 739
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values [J].
Akobeng, Anthony K. .
ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2007, 96 (03) :338-341
[2]   Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Akolekar, R. ;
Beta, J. ;
Picciarelli, G. ;
Ogilvie, C. ;
D'Antonio, F. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) :16-26
[3]   Free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in anembryonic pregnancies: confirmation that the origin is the trophoblast [J].
Alberry, M. ;
Maddocks, D. ;
Jones, M. ;
Hadi, M. Abdel ;
Abdel-Fattah, S. ;
Avent, N. ;
Soothill, P. W. .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2007, 27 (05) :415-418
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Obstet Gynecol, V126, pe31, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001051
[5]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[6]  
Benn P, 2017, J FETAL MED, V4, P13, DOI 10.1007/s40556-016-0109-8
[7]   Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis [J].
Benn, Peter ;
Borrell, Antoni ;
Chiu, Rossa W. K. ;
Cuckle, Howard ;
Dugoff, Lorraine ;
Faas, Brigitte ;
Gross, Susan ;
Huang, Tianhua ;
Johnson, Joann ;
Maymon, Ron ;
Norton, Mary ;
Odibo, Anthony ;
Schielen, Peter ;
Spencer, Kevin ;
Wright, Dave ;
Yaron, Yuval .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (08) :725-734
[8]   Prenatal Diagnosis Screening and Diagnostic Tools [J].
Carlson, Laura M. ;
Vora, Neeta L. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 44 (02) :245-+
[9]   cfDNA screening performance: accounting for and reducing test failures [J].
Cuckle, H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (06) :689-692
[10]   Strategies for Implementing Cell-Free DNA Testing [J].
Cuckle, Howard .
CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 36 (02) :213-+