Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery

被引:74
作者
Ramsey, PS
White, AM
Guinn, DA
Lu, GC
Ramin, SM
Davies, JK
Neely, CL
Newby, C
Fonseca, L
Case, AS
Kaslow, RA
Kirby, RS
Rouse, DJ
Hauth, AC
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35249 USA
[2] Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Denver, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] NW Perinatal Ctr & Womens Healthcare Associates, Portland, OR USA
[5] Obstetrix Med Grp Kansas & Missouri, Kansas City, MO USA
[6] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Houston, TX USA
[7] St Lukes Hosp, Kansas City, MO USA
[8] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL 35249 USA
[9] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal Child Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35249 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000158866.68311.d1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of subcutaneous suture reapproximation alone with suture plus subcutaneous drain for the prevention of wound complications in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized trial of women undergoing cesarean delivery. Consenting women with 4 cm or more of subcutaneous thickness were randomized to either subcutaneous suture closure alone (n = 149) or suture plus drain (n = 131). The drain was attached to bulb suction and removed at 72 hours or earlier if output was less than 30 mL/24 h. The primary study outcome was a composite wound morbidity rate (defined by any of the following: subcutaneous tissue dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, abscess, or fascial dehiscence). RESULTS: From April 2001 to July 2004, a total of 280 women were enrolled. Ninety-five percent of women (268/ 280) had a follow-up wound assessment. Both groups were similar with respect to age, race, parity, weight, cesarean indication, diabetes, steroid/antibiotic use, chorioamnionitis, and subcutaneous thickness. The composite wound morbidity rate was 17.4% (25/144) in the suture group and 22.7% (28/124) in the suture plus drain group (relative risk 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.8-2.1). Individual wound complication rates, including subcutaneous dehiscence (15.3% versus 21.8%), seroma (9.0% versus 10.6%), hematoma (2.2% versus 2.4%), abscess (0.7% versus 3.3%), fascial dehiscence (1.4% versus 1.7%), and hospital readmission for wound complications (3.5% versus 6.6%), were similar (P > .05) between women treated with suture alone and those treated with suture plus drain, respectively. CONCLUSION: The additional use of a subcutaneous drain along with a standard subcutaneous suture reapproximation technique is not effective for the prevention of wound complications in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. (c) 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 973
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] AIINANY H, 2002, GYNECOL OBSTET INVES, V53, P75
  • [2] Allaire AD, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P327
  • [3] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olkin, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, KF
    Simel, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08): : 637 - 639
  • [4] CALANDRA C, 1981, OBSTET GYNECOL, V57, P8
  • [5] Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: Effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue
    Cetin, A
    Cetin, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 57 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [6] Chelmow D, 2002, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V11, P403, DOI 10.1080/713605560
  • [7] Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis
    Chelmow, D
    Rodriguez, EJ
    Sabatimi, MM
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (05) : 974 - 980
  • [8] 5-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 23,649 SURGICAL WOUNDS
    CRUSE, PJE
    FOORD, R
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1973, 107 (02) : 206 - 210
  • [9] DELVALLE GO, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P1013
  • [10] FARNELL MB, 1986, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V121, P641