Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PM2.5 Exposure Tier Models: A Case Study of London

被引:10
作者
Kazakos, Vasilis [1 ]
Luo, Zhiwen [1 ]
Ewart, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Built Environm, Reading RG6 6DF, Berks, England
关键词
PM2.5; population exposure; tier-models; health burden misclassification; BenMap-CE; AIR-POLLUTION EXPOSURE; FINE PARTICULATE MATTER; LAND-USE REGRESSION; LONG-TERM EXPOSURE; ULTRAFINE PARTICLES; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; MORTALITY; AMBIENT; NO2; POPULATION;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph17031099
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Exposure to PM2.5 has been associated with increased mortality in urban areas. Hence, reducing the uncertainty in human exposure assessments is essential for more accurate health burden estimates. Here, we quantified the misclassification that occurred when using different exposure approaches to predict the mortality burden of a population using London as a case study. We developed a framework for quantifying the misclassification of the total mortality burden attributable to exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in four major microenvironments (MEs) (dwellings, aboveground transportation, London Underground (LU) and outdoors) in the Greater London Area (GLA), in 2017. We demonstrated that differences exist between five different exposure Tier-models with incrementally increasing complexity, moving from static to more dynamic approaches. BenMap-CE, the open source software developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, was used as a tool to achieve spatial distribution of the ambient concentration by interpolating the monitoring data to the unmonitored areas and ultimately estimating the change in mortality on a fine resolution. Indoor exposure to PM2.5 is the largest contributor to total population exposure concentration, accounting for 83% of total predicted population exposure, followed by the London Underground, which contributes approximately 15%, despite the average time spent there by Londoners being only 0.4%. After incorporating housing stock and time-activity data, moving from static to most dynamic metric, Inner London showed the highest reduction in exposure concentration (i.e., approximately 37%) and as a result the largest change in mortality (i.e., health burden/mortality misclassification) was observed in central GLA. Overall, our findings showed that using outdoor concentration as a surrogate for total population exposure but ignoring different exposure concentration that occur indoors and time spent in transit, led to a misclassification of 1174-1541 mean predicted mortalities in GLA. We generally confirm that increasing the complexity and incorporating important microenvironments, such as the highly polluted LU, could significantly reduce the misclassification of health burden assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health effect assessment of PM2.5 pollution due to vehicular traffic (case study: Isfahan)
    Soleimani, Mozhgan
    Akbari, Nematollah
    Saffari, Babak
    Haghshenas, Hosein
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2022, 24
  • [22] Exposure estimates of PM2.5 using the land-use regression with machine learning and microenvironmental exposure models for elders: Validation and comparison
    Hsu, Chin-Yu
    Hsu, Wei-Ting
    Mou, Ching-Yi
    Wong, Pei-Yi
    Wu, Chih-Da
    Chen, Yu-Cheng
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 318
  • [23] Assessment of PM2.5 exposure risk towards SDG indicator 11.6.2-A case study in Beijing
    Dong, Junwu
    Wang, Yanhui
    Wang, Lili
    Zhao, Wenji
    Huang, Chong
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 82
  • [24] Individual exposure to ambient PM2.5 and hospital admissions for COPD in 110 hospitals: a case-crossover study in Guangzhou, China
    Jin, Jie-Qi
    Han, Dong
    Tian, Qi
    Chen, Zhao-Yue
    Ye, Yun-Shao
    Lin, Qiao-Xuan
    Ou, Chun-Quan
    Li, Li
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (08) : 11699 - 11706
  • [25] Spatiotemporal trends of cardiovascular disease burden attributable to ambient PM2.5 from 1990 to 2019: A global burden of disease study
    Liu, Yan-Hua
    Bo, Ya-Cong
    You, Jie
    Liu, Shao-Fei
    Liu, Ming-Jing
    Zhu, Yong-Jian
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 885
  • [26] Impact of exposure to mine fire emitted PM2.5 on ambulance attendances: A time series analysis from the Hazelwood Health Study
    Gao, Caroline X.
    Dimitriadis, Christina
    Ikin, Jillian
    Dipnall, Joanna F.
    Wolfe, Rory
    Sim, Malcolm R.
    Smith, Karen
    Cope, Martin
    Abramson, Michael J.
    Guo, Yuming
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 196
  • [27] Urban workers' cardiovascular health due to exposure to traffic-originated PM2.5 and noise pollution in different microenvironments
    Guha, Argha Kamal
    Gokhale, Sharad
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 859
  • [28] Health Impact of PM10, PM2.5 and Black Carbon Exposure Due to Different Source Sectors in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Umea, Sweden
    Segersson, David
    Eneroth, Kristina
    Gidhagen, Lars
    Johansson, Christer
    Omstedt, Gunnar
    Nylen, Anders Engstrom
    Forsberg, Bertil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (07)
  • [29] Methods, availability, and applications of PM2.5 exposure estimates derived from ground measurements, satellite, and atmospheric models
    Diao, Minghui
    Holloway, Tracey
    Choi, Seohyun
    O'Neill, Susan M.
    Al-Hamdan, Mohammad Z.
    Van Donkelaar, Aaron
    Martin, Randall V.
    Jin, Xiaomeng
    Fiore, Arlene M.
    Henze, Daven K.
    Lacey, Forrest
    Kinney, Patrick L.
    Freedman, Frank
    Larkin, Narasimhan K.
    Zou, Yufei
    Kelly, James T.
    Vaidyanathan, Ambarish
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2019, 69 (12) : 1391 - 1414
  • [30] Association of long-term PM2.5 exposure with mortality using different air pollution exposure models: impacts in rural and urban California
    Garcia, Cynthia A.
    Yap, Poh-Sin
    Park, Hye-Youn
    Weller, Barbara L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2016, 26 (02) : 145 - 157