A pilot clinical trial of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device

被引:48
作者
Hayes, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Cwiak, Carrie [1 ]
Goedken, Peggy [1 ]
Zieman, Miriam [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Grady Mem Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
intrauterine device; contraception; postplacental insertion;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2007.06.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Postplacental intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is a safe, convenient and effective option for postpartum contraception. Few studies involve ultrasound-guided insertion, and none involve the levonorgestrel IUD or take place in the United States. Study Design: The study was conducted to assess the safety and feasibility of ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel IUD following vaginal delivery in a U.S. residency program. Levonorgestrel IUDs were inserted under ultrasound guidance within 10 min of placental delivery by band or using ring forceps. Subjects were examined at 4 and 10 weeks postpartum for evidence of expulsion or infection. Results: Thirty-four subjects were enrolled and 20 received an IUD. Follow-up data are available for 19 subjects over the 10-week follow-up period; 16 subjects returned for the 4-week follow-up, and 14 returned at 10 weeks. Two additional subjects could be contacted by telephone only. At 4 and 10 weeks postpartum, no subjects had evidence of infection. There were two expulsions (2/19, 10.5%) by 10 weeks postpartum. None of the subjects examined had a partial expulsion (intracervical location of the IUD). Conclusions: In this pilot study, ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel IUD was feasible and not associated with infection. The risk of expulsion was acceptable. Ultrasound-guided postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel IUD may be an alternative to delayed insertion but warrants further study. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 296
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices [J].
Çelen, S ;
Möröy, P ;
Sucak, A ;
Aktulay, A ;
Danisman, N .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (04) :279-282
[2]   Peripartum contraceptive attitudes and practices [J].
Cwiak, C ;
Gellasch, T ;
Zieman, M .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 70 (05) :383-386
[3]   Postpartum contraception:: the New Mexico Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System [J].
DePiñeres, T ;
Blumenthal, PD ;
Diener-West, M .
CONTRACEPTION, 2005, 72 (06) :422-425
[4]   Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up [J].
Eroglu, Kafiye ;
Akkuzu, Gulcihan ;
Vural, Gulsen ;
Dilbaz, Berna ;
Akin, Ayse ;
Taskin, Lale ;
Haberal, Ali .
CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 74 (05) :376-381
[5]   INTRAUTERINE-DEVICES AND PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE - AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
FARLEY, TMM ;
ROSENBERG, MJ ;
ROWE, PJ ;
CHEN, JH ;
MEIRIK, O .
LANCET, 1992, 339 (8796) :785-788
[6]   CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE DURING LACTATION IN THE UNITED-STATES - AN UPDATE [J].
FORD, K ;
LABBOK, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1987, 77 (01) :79-81
[7]  
Forrest J D, 1996, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V51, pS30, DOI 10.1097/00006254-199612000-00012
[8]   POSTPARTUM RETURN OF OVARIAN ACTIVITY IN NON-BREAST-FEEDING WOMEN MONITORED BY URINARY ASSAYS [J].
GRAY, RH ;
CAMPBELL, OM ;
ZACUR, HA ;
LABBOK, MH ;
MACRAE, SL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1987, 64 (04) :645-650
[9]  
GRIMES DA, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[10]   Unintended pregnancy in the United States [J].
Henshaw, SK .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 30 (01) :24-+